Recent content by Attilio II

I still don't know why these facts anger you so much. it's not like name calling disproves them. you're just making yourself look more and more stupid. good job

*they're* learn to spell before learning to argue. so far YOU have presented no facts. I GIVE FACTS a 16 foot hole in the pentagon is a fact wtc 7 which was not hit by a plane collapsed in less than 5 seconds. this is a fact where are your facts?

isn't it strange how the Pentagon has hundreds of cameras but this is all they'll show us? isn't it strange how they'll only release transcripts of the black box recordings, not the actual recordings themselves?

the ground huh? you do realize the plane barely touched the ground, even in the 1 tiny video the government released shows this. have you seen it? edit - this is in reference to the Pentagon. http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html

It's only irritating if you find some startling truth in it. since you have yet to disprove ANY of it, I think you do. and you guys keep telling me to post facts, even when actual footage is facts, and you don't come up with a single thing to counter it. all you do is say stfu... give me...

what is wrong with what I've posted? and what is your definition of fact? what sources do you trust?

Necuratul, loose change has only had 2 cuts, the third will premiere on 9/10 in NYC. though I never said to watch it, did I? Alex Jones has much better docs. my evidence has all been fact. the speed and nature of the collapse, and the other 2 crash sites. just watch those over and over and...

wow, I used that to make one point. not to discuss it. explaining who is behind 9/11 and what else they've been behind still falls into 9/11.

this thread was about 9/11 conspiracies, and everything I've said falls into that. and yes, Ron Paul is the only good candidate as he opposed the Federal Reserve and is not associated with the CFR or Bilderberg, or anything evil.

hmm, so instead of trying to fix things and get the truth out, I should just ignore it and move? should the blacks have moved instead of trying to fight segregation? wow your logic is hilarious and speaking of segregation, is it that hard to see how rulers can be wicked?

explain how I don't know about this. otherwise, shut the fuck up

that debunking site omits way too much information. it really pales in comparison to any conspiracy documentary... which I guess you're too lazy to watch.

you're mad because I try to explain not only 9/11, but the big picture as well? what's wrong with that?

I suck at debating? has anyone presented a single reputable counter fact? come on, where are they? and yeah, my last post was pretty 9/11 specific.

hours on end? they collapsed shortly after. most of the fuel was consumed in the initial blast. and once again, no plane hit wtc 7. logic would say a 100+ story steel-framed building would fall much slower than almost the speed of gravity, ESPECIALLY when it's encountering sturdy floors on...