carnut said:
Well, I don't think it's about liking or not liking a president. It was one of the first times that such horrific images were send around the world. People allover the world were shocked by them. And offcourse all the stories surrounding the murder makes this event fascinating for alot of people...
I don't think that had anything to do with it buddy. It has to do the with political views in Europe. Here in Europe the republicans are the creepy right-wing bad guys and the democrats are the left-wing humanitarians.
Especially if they are relatively young like JFK and Clinton. Living in Europe you would never know that JFK hated communism and was a fervent believer in the domino theory. And that why the bay of pigs incident happened and thats why its was good old JFK that was the first president of the US that started a real involvement in Vietnam by sending military advisor's to help the government of South-Vietnam.
A quote from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_war
"The Kennedy administration remained essentially committed to the Cold War foreign policy inherited from the Truman administration. Furthermore in 1961 Kennedy found himself faced with a three-part crisis that seemed very similar to that faced by Truman in 1949–1950. 1961 had already seen the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion, the construction of the Berlin Wall, and a negotiated settlement between the pro-Western government of Laos and the Pathet Lao Communist movement. Fearing that another failure on the part of the United States to gain control and stop Communist expansion would fatally damage the West's position and his reputation, Kennedy was determined to prevent a Communist victory in Vietnam. 'Now we have a problem in making our power credible', he said, 'and Vietnam looks like the place."
Some would like to believe that Kennnedy was on the verge of pulling US troops out of Vietnam when he was assasinated. (Oliver Stone offers the most famous version of this theory in his film "JFK".)
However, Robert Kennedy made clear in 1964, when the war was not yet unpopular, that his brother had no such intentions. (The interview excerpts below are from the Third Oral History Interview with Robert F. Kennedy, April 30, 1964, New York, New York, by John Bartlow Martin, for the John F. Kennedy Library.)
From an interview with his brother Robert:
RFK: He had a strong, overwhelming reason for being in Vietnam and that we should win the war in Vietnam.
Interviewer: What was the overwhelming reason?
RFK: Just the loss of all of Southeast Asia if you lost Vietnam. I think everybody was quite clear that the rest of Southeast Asia would fall.
Interviewer: What if it did?
RFK: Just have profound effects as far as our position throughout the world, and our position in a rather vital part of the world. Also, it would affect what happened in India, of course, which in turn has an effect on the Middle East. Just, it would have, everybody felt, a very adverse effect. It would have an effect on Indonesia, hundred million population. All of these countries would be affected by the fall of Vietnam to the Communists, particularly as we had made such a fuss in the United States both under President Eisenhower and President Kennedy about the preservation of the integrity of Vietnam.
Interviewer: There was never any consideration given to pulling out?
RFK: No.
Most people in Europe think Nixon was a fanatical warmonger when it was under Nixon that the war ended as a result of the peace talks in Paris.
Nixon wanted to end that unpopulair war as soon as possible.
It was the democrat Johnson that let the war escalate and really believed in it.
JFK like Clinton after him was a icon in Europe because they represented the good guys. Presidents like Europe likes to see them. Presidents that favor active state intervention in the economy.
Never mind that JFK had lots of affairs, never mind what Clinton did. Both of them are still very popular in Europe. Almost every town in Holland has a Kennedy street and some of the smaller villages as well. There is even a Kennedy march near Eindhoven every year.
In short, in Europe democratic presidents are popular and republicans are disliked. This means democratic presidents will become icons in Europe irrespective of what they achieved or what their policy was. Even to a point that at least in Europe, history gets re-written as in the case of JFK.
My take on it? I dislike all politicians. They are all a bunch of money grabbing thieves.