(Due to some technical problem i can't post a replay to the original thread, so i continue it here)
Someone wizer than me (not a tough tast, BTW) already said once that history is our best guide to the future. So, let us examine the history:
Alcohol was always a big part of the American sociaty. Look at American TV shows - there is always the alcohol motive. When she takes him to her apartment, she offers a drink. 'Cool dads' are the dads that son't give a sh!t about anything, and sit on the couch all day, watching TV and drinking beer.
The American sociaty, for fact, wants alcohol.
At January 1920, a new law took place - All trading, production and drinking of alcohol was frobidden. As that occured, the American sociaty was going down like a snow trailer at the slopes of France:
* Consumption of alcohol increased from 140 million gallons (at 1921) to 800 million gallons (at 1930)
* The law tripped good citizens to become "criminals"
* Moonshine was produced, and his consumption caused many people to be mimed or just die.
* Organized crime was at his peak.
The enforcement of the law was impossible and took alot of resources. Finally, the law was canceled (at December 1933).
The above clearly shows - You cannot force the sociaty against it's will and desire. Alcohol was not the desire of few, but the vast part of the American sociaty.
Same thing will happen with various drugs, as the sociaty will become aware of them. If the same will happen - people will decide that the benefit of smoking weed is greater than the bad side of it - legalization will come.
As for what Kabab said - lowering the punishment - i think this is just wrong. The whole idea of laws is that the punishment and enformenct outweigh the risk, so people decide not to commit the crime at all. If people will start see that the risk in smoking weed is not great - they will do it more oftenly. If you'd give the death penelty for each and every possible crime - the crime rate will drop in few years. Also, it will be much harder to shape sociaty and improve it. You must keep a certin relation between the penalty and the crime - so people will find the crime less attractive AND will suffer a fair punishment if they slip.
Someone wizer than me (not a tough tast, BTW) already said once that history is our best guide to the future. So, let us examine the history:
Alcohol was always a big part of the American sociaty. Look at American TV shows - there is always the alcohol motive. When she takes him to her apartment, she offers a drink. 'Cool dads' are the dads that son't give a sh!t about anything, and sit on the couch all day, watching TV and drinking beer.
The American sociaty, for fact, wants alcohol.
At January 1920, a new law took place - All trading, production and drinking of alcohol was frobidden. As that occured, the American sociaty was going down like a snow trailer at the slopes of France:
* Consumption of alcohol increased from 140 million gallons (at 1921) to 800 million gallons (at 1930)
* The law tripped good citizens to become "criminals"
* Moonshine was produced, and his consumption caused many people to be mimed or just die.
* Organized crime was at his peak.
The enforcement of the law was impossible and took alot of resources. Finally, the law was canceled (at December 1933).
The above clearly shows - You cannot force the sociaty against it's will and desire. Alcohol was not the desire of few, but the vast part of the American sociaty.
Same thing will happen with various drugs, as the sociaty will become aware of them. If the same will happen - people will decide that the benefit of smoking weed is greater than the bad side of it - legalization will come.
As for what Kabab said - lowering the punishment - i think this is just wrong. The whole idea of laws is that the punishment and enformenct outweigh the risk, so people decide not to commit the crime at all. If people will start see that the risk in smoking weed is not great - they will do it more oftenly. If you'd give the death penelty for each and every possible crime - the crime rate will drop in few years. Also, it will be much harder to shape sociaty and improve it. You must keep a certin relation between the penalty and the crime - so people will find the crime less attractive AND will suffer a fair punishment if they slip.