I sometimes ask myself what are the diferences between Saxon and Iron Maiden?
I mean there has to be an explaination why I have got all the Saxon CD's / LP's and why I 'only' have 1 Maiden CD and 3 Maiden Lp's and 2 cassette tapes fro maiden?
Lyrically I can say: the Saxon lyrics are more realistic and direct, not so far-fetched, just as life is, more vivid...I mean for example a Saxon lyric-part : I should have known better, youre just perfume and lace" I think that is finger print Saxon..In a Maiden lyric such thing I do miss!
Of course Maiden has made some great stuff, especially the Iron maiden lp, Killers (still my favorites, authentic/rough/ a bit amateuristic, but superb!!) and of course Powerslave, Number of the beast and piece of mind, but after that for me Iron Maiden went downhill..ok Fear of the Dark album was good and a song like Brave new world,..I lost contact there is something missing that was there in the beginning.. And with Saxon its different, when I compare their (Saxons)first albums with their latest albums, they are still ok and they are going uphill! I sometimes are pissed of when people say Saxon are Maiden Wannabees, I just cant make anything with that, it doesnt grasp into any brain vesel.....It sometimes makes me laugh and wonder..There is a big difference.. there has to be! Does anybody know more differences?
Of course Iron maiden has had 3 vocalists, where Biff did all those years on his own (What a strength! Like a stallion!! what an endurance!!!), and that makes Biff to me a real Bandleader! When I saw him on stage, that man has got a charism and posture of a real warrior-tribe leader,..the kind to which I would saY : I will follow you into battle commander, wherever you go !!" That man just has got something, that I miss in Bruce Dickinson... just my opinion..