Mysterious/Unexplained Awesome Stuff

entanglement

Member
Jan 30, 2006
4,297
16
38
France
You know, bermuda triangle.. stuff like that.

This one isnt so unexplained, but awesome anyway..

The Ulam Spiral:
is a simple method of graphing the prime numbers that reveals a pattern. It was discovered by the mathematician Stanisław Ulam in 1963, while he was doodling on scratch paper at a scientific meeting. Ulam, bored that day, wrote down a regular rectangular grid of numbers, starting with 1 at the center, and spiraling out.. then he circled the prime numbers, making a pattern.

Ulam_1.png
 
That's pretty weird. Does anyone know the name of the mathematical paradox that allows one to (theoretically) make 2 spheres out of one sphere that are equal in circumference and mass to the original? My algebra professor told us that's what he wrote his thesis on.
 
There's this guy named Uri Geller and..no.

Perhaps this is well known, but the story of the star Sirius B is pretty fascinating. The star is invisible to the human eye, and wasn't discovered with a telescope until 1970, but yet its existence is recorded in the 5000 year old astronomical lore of the ancient Dogon tribe.
 
This thread is nothing without a mention of Nikola Tesla's infamous "Death Ray", rumored to have created the most powerful explosion in history.

An excerpt from this article:
The mechanism behind Tesla's death ray is not well understood. It was apparently some sort of particle accelerator. Tesla said it was an outgrowth of his magnifying transformer, which focused its energy output into a thin beam so concentrated it would not scatter, even over huge distances. He promoted the device as a purely defensive weapon, intended to knock down incoming attacks - making the death ray the great-great grandfather of the Strategic Defense Initiative.

It is not certain if Tesla ever used the death ray, or indeed if he even succeeded in building one. But the following is the often-related story of what happened one night in 1908 when Tesla tested the foreboding weapon.

At the time, Robert Peary was making his second attempt to reach the North Pole. Cryptically, Tesla had notified the expedition that he would be trying to contact them somehow. They were to report to him the details of anything unusual they might witness on the open tundra. On the evening of June 30, accompanied by his associate George Scherff atop Wardenclyffe tower, Tesla aimed his death ray across the Atlantic towards the arctic, to a spot which he calculated was west of the Peary expedition.

Tesla switched on the device. At first, it was hard to tell if it was even working. Its extremity emitted a dim light that was barely visible. Then an owl flew from its perch on the tower's pinnacle, soaring into the path of the beam. The bird disintegrated instantly.

That concluded the test. Tesla watched the newspapers and sent telegrams to Peary in hopes of confirming the death ray's effectiveness. Nothing turned up. Tesla was ready to admit failure when news came of a strange event in Siberia.

On June 30, a massive explosion had devastated Tunguska, a remote area in the Siberian wilderness. Five hundred thousand square acres of land had been instantly destroyed. Equivalent to ten to fifteen megatons of TNT, the Tunguska incident is the most powerful explosion to have occurred in human history -- not even subsequent thermonuclear detonations have surpassed it. The explosion was audible from 620 miles away. Scientists believe it was caused by either a meteorite or a fragment of a comet, although no obvious impact site or mineral remnants of such an object were ever found.

Nikola Tesla had a different explanation. It was plain that his death ray had overshot its intended target and destroyed Tunguska. He was thankful beyond measure that the explosion had - miraculously - killed no one. Tesla dismantled the death ray at once, deeming it too dangerous to remain in existence.
 
Surely that can't be true. Otherwise it would lend credibility to all those conspiracy theories about energy weapons based off Tesla's work. :rolleyes:
 
The Tesla story is most likely pure bullshit. For one, you have a laser being fired over the Atlantic ocean and hitting Tunguska, and miraculously NOT hitting anything else in the beams path (except for that poor owl). So this laser just happened to not hit any trees and hit a that ended up creating a huge blast radius with all the trees in the area pushed in opposing directions. Yeah sure.

Also, do you really think a scientist with the capability to accurately measure distance (and don't say that we can't, hell, the first really accurate measurements of the earths diameter, and how far it is to the moon, were done by the ancient Greeks). "Oh shit I think there over here - maybe, whatever oh well dur dur dur ::fires::"

Here are two maps to show jut how off Tesla's aim was:

map_tunguska.jpg


arcticmap-explore.gif


Do you really think a scientist (who could make a death ray no less), would utterly fuck up that much?



More than likely it was a portion of one of the comets that flew by that year, or a meteor. Then you may ask "why isn't there an impact crater!?"

Pretty simple, it exploded over the site due to the pressure of entering the atmosphere.




Edit:

The universe.

sagan-galaxy.jpg
 
1. The death of Rudolf Diesel:

http://inventors.suite101.com/article.cfm/mysterious_death_of_rudolph_diesel

2. The quantification of infinity.

The definition of infinity is, simply, an indefinite or never-ending amount of something. Most often we would equate infinity with a kind of absoluteness, while we would consider 'nothingness' to be the opposite of infinity. Essentially, infinity is substance that continues forever.

However, we run into a problem when trying to actually quantify infinity, or attribute substance to it. Since infinity is never-ending, the ratio of its whole to its parts is astronomically (and impossibly) huge. However, we can't actually define infinity as getting larger and larger, because then we would have to be able to assign some value to it. Even if its parts are immeasurably small, they still retain some substance.

Rather, infinity is so inconceivably huge that its parts can't be given value at all; they are zero. Therefore, infinity is logically zero.
 
The Tesla story is most likely pure bullshit. For one, you have a laser being fired over the Atlantic ocean and hitting Tunguska, and miraculously NOT hitting anything else in the beams path (except for that poor owl). So this laser just happened to not hit any trees and hit a that ended up creating a huge blast radius with all the trees in the area pushed in opposing directions. Yeah sure.

Also, do you really think a scientist with the capability to accurately measure distance (and don't say that we can't, hell, the first really accurate measurements of the earths diameter, and how far it is to the moon, were done by the ancient Greeks). "Oh shit I think there over here - maybe, whatever oh well dur dur dur ::fires::"

Here are two maps to show jut how off Tesla's aim was:

Do you really think a scientist (who could make a death ray no less), would utterly fuck up that much?



More than likely it was a portion of one of the comets that flew by that year, or a meteor. Then you may ask "why isn't there an impact crater!?"


It wasn't actually a ray, like the laser beam you are apparently thinking of. It worked off the concept of "energy from the void". Do some research on Tesla's work before bashing it.
 
It wasn't actually a ray, like the laser beam you are apparently thinking of. It worked off the concept of "energy from the void". Do some research on Tesla's work before bashing it.

:sigh:

And pray tell, what is the "energy of the void"? Google brings up dark matter, which is barely understood as it is today. So if ever could enlighten the rest of us poor saps about dark matter and energy, then I could hopefully pass this info off to the physics department at MIT - I'm sure they'll be amused.
 
I've tried to read up on them but both Dark Matter and Anti-Matter (especially this) leave me scratching my head.
 
What you were talking about just reminded me about the rabbit article, sorry if it came off in a different way.
 
That's not quite it. What I meant is this:

spheres.jpg


If the circles represent spheres, then, in theory (according the aforementioned paradox) you could "dismantle" the original sphere and come up with 2 spheres with dimensions each equal to the original. I think I may have wrote it down in my notes, but I have no idea where I put those fucking things.

Doesn't that violate conservation of mass or something like that?