no country for old wainds
Active Member
- Nov 23, 2002
- 26,569
- 9,583
- 113
Regardless, I would say that superiority is down to who can perform the most productive tasks to what degree, with "most productive" having to be as objective as possible.
New Study Vindicates Harvard's Larry Summers
- Thread starter Planetary Eulogy
- Start date
Kenneth R.
Cináed
from a gender perspective those lines have clear extremes (such as only women can give birth) however there are less certain regions such as "work". work is an extremely broad term, and i think that ultimately, short of a man trying to give birth 
or similar extremes, women and men should be allowed whatever roles their minds drive them towards most. a woman who desires strongly to be a factory worker will not make a good stay-at-home mother if she is forced to it, nor will a man fare well in the army if he desires most to be a gardener. though one gender may be ON AVERAGE "better" than the other at certain tasks... ultimately it is a case-by-case basis.
that is regarding genders. racially, i believe it is moreso a case-by-case basis, as there is no current proof of racial superiority nor do i ever think there will be.
or similar extremes, women and men should be allowed whatever roles their minds drive them towards most. a woman who desires strongly to be a factory worker will not make a good stay-at-home mother if she is forced to it, nor will a man fare well in the army if he desires most to be a gardener. though one gender may be ON AVERAGE "better" than the other at certain tasks... ultimately it is a case-by-case basis.that is regarding genders. racially, i believe it is moreso a case-by-case basis, as there is no current proof of racial superiority nor do i ever think there will be.
anonymousnick2001
World's Greatest Vocalist
Silent Song said:
Um... you're too stupid to argue with, but I suggest you revisit the history of the Greeks and Romans, as well as some of the comments in the Bhagavad-Gita on this topic.