Tah dah!

OH okay, he says there is no animal between amphibian and mammals. But he is really a douchebag, it's not as black and white, and an animal is not half one/half another one.

I really don't understand those kind of people.
 
All i could think about when i was watching that video was nailing Kelly. :worship:
 
RR_kelly.jpg


:p
 
Are these people or this show well-known? Cuz I have no idea who any of them are, though while this Kelly may be absolutely slammin', she doesn't sound like she could give a rational response that wasn't pre-scripted if her life depended on it :goggly:
 
Both sides were terrible. The Crocoduck is just ridiculous.. clearly every species intermingled and that's what evolution is, right?

But the athiests were disappointing. Really. Every time Christians try to denounce evolution as being a front against God, athiests say 'oh but evolution wasn't discovered to go against Christianity, its science!'. Then when the athiests are asked to 'prove' evolution, they start rattling off about why Christianity is wrong. Nice work, retards. And nice tits :)
 
Morgan C said:
Both sides were terrible. The Crocoduck is just ridiculous.. clearly every species intermingled and that's what evolution is, right?

But the athiests were disappointing. Really. Every time Christians try to denounce evolution as being a front against God, athiests say 'oh but evolution wasn't discovered to go against Christianity, its science!'. Then when the athiests are asked to 'prove' evolution, they start rattling off about why Christianity is wrong. Nice work, retards. And nice tits :)
Click to expand...

yeah +1...neither side had any idea what they were talking about, or any idea how to properly debate...

And jesus, her voice jumps by like 8 semitones every other word
 
FYI that Kelly O'Connor chick left that group to start doing legal prostitution(bunny ranch I think?) and also purse a career in porn.

I'd hit it.
 
The theory of evolution as presented by Darwin isn't perfect, transitional forms are a bit of a problem, as is the "not-dog" problem (intensive breeding can be seen as a sped up version of natural evolution, after all it is just extreme selection. You can breed dogs as extremely as you like, they're still dogs. You can't breed a not-dog if you started with 2 dogs).

However, if you look back to the late 19th century, newtons laws were being brought into question and indeed being shown to give inaccurate predictions. Didn't mean it was reasonable to say gravity and forces etc. don't exist and it's all god moving every particle in the universe individually.

EDIT: all it takes is to wait for the next genius to create the new complete theory of evolution. It'll look amazing at the time and then over the years we'll realise it's full of holes too! Welcome to science, it's frustrating but AT LEAST WE'RE TRYING
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom