i have a ton of that. in random order:Misanthrope said:And i mean stuff that really hurts.
Woah, I can see how that would fuck you up. Scary shitMalaclypse said:worst thing for me, it was "i am pregnant".
p.s.: she wasn't.
hyena said:@gp: why do you take so much offence at that? i mean - either it's true or it isn't (that you are overweight). if you are, the person is just stating a fact, and probably it would be good for your health to lose some. if you aren't, the person is lying, and in that case it's not shallow and sensless as much as unfounded....
wasn't offended. i just said i obviously am not the type of woman you're attracted to. which is okay, because i am shallow and superficial therefore i don't like overweight. just as you're shallow and superficial and you don't like short hair. but i see a double standard in your judgement.GreatPhoenix said:Probably the same reason it offended you so greatly that I said you look like a dude.
no, i'm not, as a matter of fact.GreatPhoenix said:You're so stupid.
Not trying to question your intelligence, but I fail to see how any of those points you mention would prove anything about a person's relative intelligence/stupidity. This should probably go to another thread, but the one person I see as the most intelligent I have ever met, has no education beyond the compulsory school, has never published anything (although he happens to be an excellent writer), has never done any research and certainly has never earned much.hyena said:provide me with details of your education, your records as a published author, and a general idea of how much you make a year by working in research and i'll let you know how much you score, relatively speaking, on the "visible intellect" scale.
hyena said:wasn't offended. i just said i obviously am not the type of woman you're attracted to. which is okay, because i am shallow and superficial therefore i don't like overweight. just as you're shallow and superficial and you don't like short hair. but i see a double standard in your judgement.
no, i'm not, as a matter of fact.
provide me with details of your education, your records as a published author, and a general idea of how much you make a year by working in research and i'll let you know how much you score, relatively speaking, on the "visible intellect" scale.
I gave you a mildly negative nickname because you threw a stone at me (commenting on my looks in a sarcastic way) when i hadn't done anything to you at all. so i was just reacting, you provoked me after i did something which was not directed at you in any way (ie post a photo of myself in a picture thread).GreatPhoenix said:P.S. If you weren't offended why did you make a personal attack against me in your response (calling me "bratphoenix")? It's clear that you took offense, otherwise you'd have no point in saying that.
[...]
Whoa, talk about saving throw. "Oh noes, he thinks I'm stupid, I must prove myself instead of shutting up and learning my lesson!"
Your education, record as a published author and yearly wages are not enough to save you from making stupid comments on the internet. I guess this illustrates the grim truth in the separation between book smarts and common sense.
...because it's the internet that really matters? I hope this was a joke on your part. (Not that I'm against you in this little discussion, nor "with" you either. But since Hyena's comment original education/wages comment was identified as being a little odd, this should be too. That will be all.)GreatPhoenix said:Your education, record as a published author and yearly wages are not enough to save you from making stupid comments on the internet.