Karmic said:but not using absolutes in a discussion where the opposing party does deal in absolutes, doesn't that somewhat make your statement seem weaker?
and, I would believe she was referring to certain aspects, most likely especially the controversial ones.
Necromunchkin said:Given the masses that program was meant for, I doubt there was much swaying.
neal said:Final Product>>> so what specifically were all of these 'absolutes' she was dealing in? other than 'muslims treat women like beasts' i didnt really hear anything that couldnt be backed up by examples. i guess you could claim the whole 'a jew has never blown themselves up in a gernam restaraunt etc.' i suppose are 'absolutes', but its like, true. (i only watched it once)
Necromunchkin said:I point out she was actually challenging that argument, by pointing out that it's not a clash between civilizations, she was referencing arguments cited by many Muslim extremists in arguing why protestors in Pakistan, Iran, etc are justified in attacking buildings associated with the West. Her point was that it is merely a clash of ideologies based purely on one group believing one thing and the other not believing it.