Help Stop the CFR's Treason
04-13-2007
NAPA Valley Register
The 2006 Annual Report of the Council on Foreign Relations is more alarming than many previous editions.
The report demonstrates that a number of dangerous initiatives are rapidly being undertaken. However, two moves stand out that are of concern to Americans:
1. They are brazen in their determination to merge the three countries of Mexico, Canada and these United States. Integration is the word they use. This, of course, is treason. What else can you call merging the countries of North America? It means the end of U.S. sovereignty, the Constitution as the law of the land and the freedom of the American people.
2. They have made great strides in enlisting the help of individuals who previously could be counted on to oppose their plans. One person in particular stands out: Richard D. Land, President of the Southern Baptist Convention Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, elected to CFR membership last year. This is by no means the only example of CFR influence in the Christian right.
One of the key elements in their dangerous initiatives is the North American Free Trade Agreement. We learned how important NAFTA would be to the insiders from Henry Kissinger in 1993. He said NAFTA is not a conventional trade agreement, but the architecture of a new international system. Not everyone believed it at the time of its enactment, but subsequent events have shown that Kissinger knew what he was talking about. He said that it was the architecture of the New World order. The architecture the basis therefore for merging the United States into the North American Union is based on NAFTA. Many other agenda items of the insiders likewise are based on NAFTA. NAFTA gives the insiders the legal base to proceed. The documents we have seen concerning merger, immigration, corridors and many other initiatives rest on NAFTA, and the architects of the North American merger say so either openly or by implication. If, for no other reason, we need to get rid of NAFTA because its tribunals can now supersede our state and federal courts, including the Supreme Court, placing our courts under international control.
Representative Virgil H. Goode Jr., R-Va., introduced House Concurrent Resolution 22 expressing the sense of Congress that the President should provide notice of withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement. Representative Goode also introduced House Concurrent Resolution 40 expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada. Please contact your representative and senators and urge them to support both H. Con. Res. 22 and H. Con. Res. 40.
Be sure to utilize the letter found under Stop the NAFTA Super Highway Steppingstone to a North American Union found on the Legislative Action Center web page: http://capwiz.com/ibs/home/
04-13-2007
NAPA Valley Register
The 2006 Annual Report of the Council on Foreign Relations is more alarming than many previous editions.
The report demonstrates that a number of dangerous initiatives are rapidly being undertaken. However, two moves stand out that are of concern to Americans:
1. They are brazen in their determination to merge the three countries of Mexico, Canada and these United States. Integration is the word they use. This, of course, is treason. What else can you call merging the countries of North America? It means the end of U.S. sovereignty, the Constitution as the law of the land and the freedom of the American people.
2. They have made great strides in enlisting the help of individuals who previously could be counted on to oppose their plans. One person in particular stands out: Richard D. Land, President of the Southern Baptist Convention Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, elected to CFR membership last year. This is by no means the only example of CFR influence in the Christian right.
One of the key elements in their dangerous initiatives is the North American Free Trade Agreement. We learned how important NAFTA would be to the insiders from Henry Kissinger in 1993. He said NAFTA is not a conventional trade agreement, but the architecture of a new international system. Not everyone believed it at the time of its enactment, but subsequent events have shown that Kissinger knew what he was talking about. He said that it was the architecture of the New World order. The architecture the basis therefore for merging the United States into the North American Union is based on NAFTA. Many other agenda items of the insiders likewise are based on NAFTA. NAFTA gives the insiders the legal base to proceed. The documents we have seen concerning merger, immigration, corridors and many other initiatives rest on NAFTA, and the architects of the North American merger say so either openly or by implication. If, for no other reason, we need to get rid of NAFTA because its tribunals can now supersede our state and federal courts, including the Supreme Court, placing our courts under international control.
Representative Virgil H. Goode Jr., R-Va., introduced House Concurrent Resolution 22 expressing the sense of Congress that the President should provide notice of withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement. Representative Goode also introduced House Concurrent Resolution 40 expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada. Please contact your representative and senators and urge them to support both H. Con. Res. 22 and H. Con. Res. 40.
Be sure to utilize the letter found under Stop the NAFTA Super Highway Steppingstone to a North American Union found on the Legislative Action Center web page: http://capwiz.com/ibs/home/
