An attack on blacks or an attack against bad fashion?

J.

Old Fart
Jul 24, 2001
26,315
1,176
113
The Woodlands
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/09/low.pants.ap/index.html

RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Virginians who wear their pants so low their underwear shows may want to think about investing in a stronger belt.

The state's House of Delegates passed a bill Tuesday authorizing a $50 fine for anyone who displays his or her underpants in a "lewd or indecent manner."

Del. Lionell Spruill Sr., a Democrat who opposed the bill, had pleaded with his colleagues to remember their own youthful fashion follies.

During an extended monologue Monday, he talked about how they dressed or wore their hair in their teens. On Tuesday, he said the measure was an unconstitutional attack on young blacks that would force parents to take off work to accompany their children to court just for making a fashion statement.

"This is a foolish bill, Mr. Speaker, because it will hurt so many," Spruill said before the measure was approved 60-34. It now goes to the state Senate.

The bill's sponsor, Del. Algie T. Howell, has said constituents were offended by the exposed underwear. He did not speak on the floor Tuesday.

Spruill and Howell, also a Democrat, are both black.
 
Whoa, that saggin' thing still goes on? Now look, I'm about the furthest thing there is from a fashion whore, but god damn. Welcome to 1992 fags.
 
lizard said:
true. it is one of the stupidist fashion trends in my memory (unless its a chick, then it is brilliant!)

YES! Seeing a thong sticking out the top of low cut jeans is damn nice. I once saw a girl (a receptionist at work) reach down the back of her pants to hoist up her thong. She basically just gave herself a tighter wedgie...it was the highlight of the day.
 
I'd like to go on record by saying that hot girls with exposed undewear = hotter.
 
on the news here they were talking about that and mainly focusing on girls pants and their thongs!(well yes) then at the very end of the story they briefly mentioned it also included the sagging pants guys wear.
but what i wanna know is, am i gonna be hassled when i wear my buttless pants in VA :erk:
 
haha i remember in elementary school, when a kids pants were sagging because he was poor and didn't have a belt, they would give him a real belt. but if it was a kid sagging his pants just to be cool, they would make him wear a rope :lol:
 
JayKeeley said:
YES! Seeing a thong sticking out the top of low cut jeans is damn nice. I once saw a girl (a receptionist at work) reach down the back of her pants to hoist up her thong. She basically just gave herself a tighter wedgie...it was the highlight of the day.

I just like to add that when girls are wearing their pants low: ordinary (preferably coloured) underwear > thongs

Like that, plus the (preferably mildly bagy) sagging pants:
439.jpg
 
I prefer g-string. In fact, if they are wearing a thong or regular chones, keep that shit in the pants because it looks foolish.
 
One Inch Man said:
Whoa, that saggin' thing still goes on? Now look, I'm about the furthest thing there is from a fashion whore, but god damn. Welcome to 1992 fags.

:lol:

I think this is a good thing :)