Anyone heard the new Marilyn Manson?

You shouldn't be posting in an internet forum if all you want from other people is politically correct replies. If someone says ''MM sucks rhino cock'' you know very well that it means ''i don't like him''. Pretty lame to try to tell people how they should express their opinions.
What is lame here is your inability to read what I wrote and stay on-topic. I never requested clean talk from people.
 
I dont love MM or hate him.

His music is ok but I dont own any of it and never probably will. But I certainly wont burst out with some homophobic comment using 20 cuss words to let everyone know how narrow minded I am.

Ive heard some interview from MM and hes got a pretty smart head between his shoulders. And based on his dressing style and overall image, hes got some interesting tastes. But that never bugs me. Hes a rock star just like Kiss, Alice Cooper and Ozzy.

But I do give him props for the girls he gets. Im sure they are all atracted to the overall rockstar life he lives, the unique styles and then offcourse the moolah.

I dont hate, he at least is better than Linkin Park, Creed, Puddle of Mudd and some other lame rock metal outfits.
 
What is lame here is your inability to read what I wrote and stay on-topic. I never requested clean talk from people.

Yes you did, fact: "So, no more: MM sUck DiCks hAs No TaleNt. LoNg LiVE OpETH!" ..you seem to be forgetting what you've been posting. btw, questioning something doesn't mean i'm not ''on-topic', and who the fuck cares? are you the new mod of the forum?. Learn the fucking difference.
 
Yes you did, fact: "So, no more: MM sUck DiCks hAs No TaleNt. LoNg LiVE OpETH!" ..you seem to be forgetting what you've been posting.
I'm not. Read that quote in the context of the post I made:

Negative [and preferably thoughtful] replies concerning the new album are welcome.

But so far, the negative replies have not only been totally gratuitous, but plain off-topic. So, no more: "MM sUck DiCks hAs No TaleNt. LoNg LiVE OpETH!" kind of comments. Thanks.

translated:
"MM sUck DiCks hAs No TaleNt. LoNg LiVE OpETH!" as in gratuitous and off-topic.

btw, questioning something doesn't mean i'm not ''on-topic', and who the fuck cares?
You questioned. I explained. No hard feelings.
 
I dont love MM or hate him.

His music is ok but I dont own any of it and never probably will. But I certainly wont burst out with some homophobic comment using 20 cuss words to let everyone know how narrow minded I am.

Ive heard some interview from MM and hes got a pretty smart head between his shoulders. And based on his dressing style and overall image, hes got some interesting tastes. But that never bugs me. Hes a rock star just like Kiss, Alice Cooper and Ozzy.

But I do give him props for the girls he gets. Im sure they are all atracted to the overall rockstar life he lives, the unique styles and then offcourse the moolah.

I dont hate, he at least is better than Linkin Park, Creed, Puddle of Mudd and some other lame rock metal outfits.

very well said!!!...some of these forumites would be right at home in a Jean M.Auel novel.....
 
Read the topic and then we talk.

I guess we should ask Samsara to change the topic title to "Sadguru recruits MM fans. Dissent unwelcome."

If you read any of the shit I wrote (and apparently you don't read anything at all) I defended Manson on one of the previous pages. I dislike his music personally, but another poster decided to take a cheap shot at his image, which has zero to do with his intelligence, as the poster claimed. I had to correct that bullshit, and later again when another poster tried to draw a correlation between the character of people who dislike the guy, people who like him, and his intelligence/talent. These are stupid, baseless conclusions and are unacceptable forms of criticism.

However, YOU are attacking anyone who says anything negative about him, regardless of whatever that might be. The comments you quote in your "stay on topic zomg!" posts are clearly negative and clearly unconstructive. However they are valid opinions and not guilty of the same kind of baseless conclusion-drawing I outlined above. Therefore the one who is pulling this thread offtopic into an argument is YOU, sadguru.
 
If you read any of the shit I wrote (and apparently you don't read anything at all) I defended Manson on one of the previous pages. I dislike his music personally, but another poster decided to take a cheap shot at his image, which has zero to do with his intelligence, as the poster claimed. I had to correct that bullshit, and later again when another poster tried to draw a correlation between the character of people who dislike the guy, people who like him, and his intelligence/talent. These are stupid, baseless conclusions and are unacceptable forms of criticism.
That's not the point now is it?

However, YOU are attacking anyone who says anything negative about him, regardless of whatever that might be. The comments you quote in your "stay on topic zomg!" posts are clearly negative and clearly unconstructive. However they are valid opinions and not guilty of the same kind of baseless conclusion-drawing I outlined above. Therefore the one who is pulling this thread offtopic into an argument is YOU, sadguru.
You got it wrong Kenneth. My "attacks" were given in response to the gratuitous, off-topic and predictable nature of the comments, not because they were negative toward Manson. Again, the topic is about MM's new album "Eat Me, Drink Me". You can comment on Manson and still be off-topic. The same way, talking about Mikeal's moustache in a Ghost Reveries related thread is off-topic.

I'm well aware I'm turning this thread completely off-topic, but the very purpose of this discussion is to get back on the main topic, which is Marilyn Manson's new album.
 
As a reminder, the thread is about Manson's new album. Let's try to stay on-topic people...
I'm well aware I'm turning this thread completely off-topic.
Congratulations, you're an imbecile. Since when is any internet discussion strictly on topic? Secondly, you need to remove whatever is in your anus before posting again in this thread. Thirdly, The point I made in my previous post, as I shall now spell out in small chunks for your feeble illiterate mind, is that: (and please don't be one of those fucking troll shmucks and reply with a seperate individual quote and retort to each sentence of the following)

1.) I am fair to Manson though I dislike his music, or on a grander scale: my negative comments are not unwarranted attempts at passing off opinion for fact.
2.) That I find the doing of such pedestrian and idiotic.
3.) That although it's going to hurt your ego, you have to accept that the other imbeciles in this sandbox are NOT doing such for the most part with the exceptions of those I already chastized.
4.) That the one with the stick up his ass and driving the entire discussion off topic is YOU, the very hypocrite who, in your attempt to force the discussion to a particular aspect, have derailed your own thread. I congratulate you again.
5.) You have to realize that in discussing the merits of a particular album, some people's opinion of the artist is that all the albums are bad, or are good. You yourself are guilty of such off-topic posts, Mr. Hypocrite. Saying "Manson Sucks" or "That album rocks" or "I love album Y or X" are equally off-topic if you want to be so particular, but most non-dipshits understand the need for supplementary discussion. By the way, I probably won't be reading your reply. Since you're illiterate, this post is directed to everyone else BUT SadGuru.
 
Congratulations, you're an imbecile. Since when is any internet discussion strictly on topic? Secondly, you need to remove whatever is in your anus before posting again in this thread. Thirdly, The point I made in my previous post, as I shall now spell out in small chunks for your feeble illiterate mind, is that: (and please don't be one of those fucking troll shmucks and reply with a seperate individual quote and retort to each sentence of the following)

1.) I am fair to Manson though I dislike his music, or on a grander scale: my negative comments are not unwarranted attempts at passing off opinion for fact.
2.) That I find the doing of such pedestrian and idiotic.
3.) That although it's going to hurt your ego, you have to accept that the other imbeciles in this sandbox are NOT doing such for the most part with the exceptions of those I already chastized.
4.) That the one with the stick up his ass and driving the entire discussion off topic is YOU, the very hypocrite who, in your attempt to force the discussion to a particular aspect, have derailed your own thread. I congratulate you again.
5.) You have to realize that in discussing the merits of a particular album, some people's opinion of the artist is that all the albums are bad, or are good. You yourself are guilty of such off-topic posts, Mr. Hypocrite. Saying "Manson Sucks" or "That album rocks" or "I love album Y or X" are equally off-topic if you want to be so particular, but most non-dipshits understand the need for supplementary discussion. By the way, I probably won't be reading your reply. Since you're illiterate, this post is directed to everyone else BUT SadGuru.
Point 1 to 3 aren't valid points in the context of that discussion.
As for point 4, it's true to a certain extend. I assume it. But like I already pointed out earlier, I later-on went off-topic in an attempt to bring the focus back on the main topic.
As for point 5, I went off-topic at some point in the discussion and later realized that the off-topic comments went overboard. That's why I felt the need to refocus on the topic.

Oh, about the ego, you probably are the last person I would take lessons from .

Now, I have nothing against you Kenneth. Can we get back to the topic now? If you cannot, well, my thread will be screwed and I won't be able to sleep tonight.