Anyone used an AT3525?

Soundlurker

Member
Nov 19, 2005
3,730
0
36
I can get one second-hand and am wondering if it's a decent entry/mid level vocal mic. Seems to be a pretty old model and all I can find is a SOS article from 1998.
Any similar to the AT4040 at all? I've used those and I generally like them.
 
at3525.jpg


http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may98/articles/at30.html
The AT3525 is a medium/large-diaphragm, back-electret microphone with a fixed-cardioid polar pattern, switchable 10dB pad and switchable 80Hz, 12dB/octave high-pass filter. Both switches are recessed and located on the underside of the mic rather than on the side, as would be more usual. The capsule employs a very thin diaphragm with a gold surface layer, suspended above a precision-milled backplate, and artificial ageing is used to stabilise the capsule performance. The output from the mic is on a conventionally wired balanced XLR with gold-plated pins, and a sturdy shock-mount is included, along with a soft, zip-up case. Full 48V phantom power is required (+/- 4 V).

One of the AT3525's claims to fame is that it can handle very high SPLs, up to 156dB with the pad switched in (1% distortion at this level), so it can be used in virtually any environment, including in close proximity to drums and other loud percussion. Predictably, this reduces its sensitivity slightly when compared to other typical large-diaphragm mics (-48dB (3.9mV) ref 1V at 1 Pa), but it's still sensitive enough for most typical studio instrument and vocal recording applications. The useful frequency response extends from 30Hz to 20kHz, and the included plot shows a nominally flat response up to 2kHz, followed by a wide presence rise, maxing out at around 4dB before dropping off again at around 12kHz.

Another review
http://www.moultonlabs.com/more/audio_technica_30_series_microphones/

Looks pretty cool with the yoke mount.
I haven't used one.

It's probably useful, but there are SO MANY similar mics. What else do you have?
 
Like I suspected the AT3525 is a back electret sold as a condenser so it will most definitely sound different than the 4040. Not necessarily bad but not the same kind of result. I personally find the 4040 too artificially bright though..
There are cheap Oktavamod LDC like the MCA SP1 I would seriously consider. The price/performance ratio is unbeatable.
 
Yeah but the MCA SP1 is $350 + shipping from the USA + 20% VAT + 5% Customs ... I can probably get the AT for €140-160.
 
A local studio here has these and uses them for cymbals. Here's my friends' band Manic Scum who recorded with them. They're on the cymbals and I believe the vocals as well. Can't recall what was in the kick, and the snare had this cool top/bottom clip-on contraption with some small ATH mics I can't recall the names of. Guitars are just 57's. I handled the tones on that, but otherwise had nothing to do with the actual mix (I would have personally done something about that snare drum...)

http://www.reverbnation.com/manicscum
 
Thanks for all the input guys. I've already made an offer. If the price is right and I end up buying it I'll probably post some clips in case anyone's interested :)
 
OK, so I got it and I can't properly test it right now but from my brief experience with it it has a pretty low volume which when compensated for with more gain gets kinda noisy, which is kind of a let down. It does seem to perform noticeably better on the key test than a well-know cheap LDC:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1891957/LDC keys test.rar
Sibilants are not as harsh but overall so far I'm not so sure if it was worth buying this mic. Need to get some vocals and guitars for more tests.
 
If it has a low sensitivity, it could mean that the electret element has been exposed to excessive heat and lost a portion of its electrical charge.
I know my NT3's aren't as sensitive as the used to. I bought them twelve years ago.