His unique sense of phrasing as well. To me, he has more in common in some sense with the RIO singer Dagmar Krause - equally innovative and influential in her own way - than with people he is often compared to, such as Geoff Tate.
Ok, I can now somewhat see where you're coming from and conclude that our tastes in singers are just miles apart. I don't like Dagmar Krause's voice at all either. And yes, I would agree with you that on some level she and Arch are similiar.
Tate had a great voice, but compared to Arch he's just not much to speak of. Arch is a one-of-a-kind vocalist. Once he's dead, no one's going to sing like Arch anymore. Just the way it is.
Fair enough, but there are some one-of-a-kind vocalists I'm not going to miss at all. Think Axl Rose...
What bothers me with the nasally singing styles of John Arch or Dagmar Krause is that it to me hides any emotion that might be there. I just don't get any emotional connection to the lyrics - not saying that there isn't any - I just can't really hear it through that tone and am rather just left with slowly increasing annoyance.
You see, my favourite vocalists are really without an exception vocalists who are focused on conveying emotions rather than reaching a level technical flawlessness. Examples would be Devin Townsend. Sseriously, in pretty much everything he sings, you can really hear that he means it, more so than with almost any singer imo. His delivery is really nuanced, and his voice extremely varied (Qualities which I don't find with singers like Arch).
Same can be to be the reason why I find Cynthesis - DeEvolution to be the superior prog album compared to Arch/Matheos. The singer Erik Rosvold is really focused on portraying emotions on it and really makes the story work, and he really has the kind of tone that I could listen to for hours and hours.
Both sound like they have their soul invested on the performance and that's really something I look for in great singers.
Last edited by a moderator: