have you read last week's new yorker? it has a LOT of very good articles, including a big and detailed piece about Bjork (with lots of information about her compositional techniques), a WWI thing, and an Oliver Sacks essay about the perception of time and neural influences on it.
the Oliver Sacks thing was REALLY interesting to me because i'd been musing over one of the issues he touches on the week before i read this! about how the brain, in certain situations, perceives things as "frames", rather than a continuous flow. i had been wondering about that myself, and had concluded that we couldn't perceive stuff in a continuous flow, so our "frames" were "moments of perception" that our brains put together...and according to Sacks I was mostly right! of course he thought of a zillion things i hadn't, so it was the perfect article: informative and also personal/engaging.
the Oliver Sacks thing was REALLY interesting to me because i'd been musing over one of the issues he touches on the week before i read this! about how the brain, in certain situations, perceives things as "frames", rather than a continuous flow. i had been wondering about that myself, and had concluded that we couldn't perceive stuff in a continuous flow, so our "frames" were "moments of perception" that our brains put together...and according to Sacks I was mostly right! of course he thought of a zillion things i hadn't, so it was the perfect article: informative and also personal/engaging.