Beats by Dre?

That was pretty interesting to read, it did basically prove that Beats are really overpriced crap and yet still so successful company because of it, good marketing in a nutshell I guess.
 
I was just in a Fry's store yesterday listening to different sets of cans, and from the consumer ones they had demo sets of, the Bose won out by a long shot. The Sony's were muffled, the Beats were just hollow sounding and stuffy but the Bose were the most balanced. of course no pro-audio cans were set up to listen on but they did have a few AKG and Audio Technica sets in stock.
 
I have a set of older AKG in my studio and they can't hold a candle to the Bose QC-15. The middle of the line Beats I had were different but not better or far worse than the AKG. More bass-hyped, less clear. Whatever you make of that.

I haven't checked out the Audio Technica studio headphones, but I really don't know what they could do better than my Bose (which I had for travel and only recently started using for checking low end in mixing).
 
That's a pretty normal manufacturing to retail price markup (1250%). Sammy sort of raised this point on Slack but it costs $.75 to manufacture a nickelback cd that retails for $15 (2000%). I'm not arguing that they're good, but just looking at manufacturing costs for any consumer good is probably going to make it look like a rip off. The bottom line is that if you told me my M50's only cost $5 to make I'd still use them every day and wouldn't regret the purchase.