Pelata
FINAL SIGN
To say that the true nature of metal is simply rebellion might have been true in it's early days, but isn't it possible that we've progressed beyond that by now?
That's kinda where I was going too...
To say that the true nature of metal is simply rebellion might have been true in it's early days, but isn't it possible that we've progressed beyond that by now?
Actually, I had no clue. I knew you had contributed to this thread. However, I had no idea you were staunchly religious. I had simply assumed you were someone, unlike myself, who didn't care if the lyrics were of a religious nature.You know as well as I do that I'm staunchly religious...
On this we agree; Metal is about non-conformity. However, much of religion is about conformity. It's for this reason, I see the two as a strange pairing.If the idea of metal is non-conformity, then why should it stick to a set of standards?
I completely disagree.
Metal has always advocated for rebelling against authority, being an individual, drug exploration and sexual freedom. It's done so through its lyrics, its fashion and its artwork, as well as through the statements, actions and antics of its performers. Christianity stands in stark opposition to every aspect of this.
Rebelling against authority... the Church holds itself up to the world as the ultimate authority. Metal songs have never suggested you should rebel against all authorities... except the really big ones.
Individualism... the Church preaches complete and total conformity. In its own language, in its own holy texts, it refers (time and time again) to its followers as "sheep". This is not my word, this is theirs. This is not individualism.
Sexuality... the church is against almost all sexuality. Even within the confines of marriage, the Church places restrictions on sexuality. Granted, there are more liberal churches and no two churches preach an identical message. However, I don't think anyone is going to confuse the church's position on sexuality and what WASP sings about.
Drug use... Christianity teaches us the body is a temple. Would someone like to argue that Metal musicians and their fans follow this rule?
Look, there's was a reason why churchgoers would frequently protest outside of Metal shows (back in the day); because the Church views Metal as the opposition.
Finally, let's talk about Metal's roots. I think most would say Metal began with Black Sabbath. Uhhh.... Black Sabbath? What does that name tell you? Judas Priest? Judas friggin Priest? Seriously? What about Metal's root would suggest it's not anti-religion?
Look... if someone wants to listen to or write Christian Metal... knock your socks off. If you like it, find inspiration from it or just want to bang your head to it... great. I'm of the belief that whatever makes you happy, that doesn't harm others, you should do. However, to suggest that Christianity and Metal create the Reese's Peanut Butter Cup of the musical world, truly borders on silliness. If we're being fair, then we must admit, the idea of Christian Metal is about as internally consistent as Satanic Gospel music.
Zod
I think I'm going to take this as my queue to bow out of this thread. The thread has reached a point where it can't end anywhere good. So with that in mind... cheers.I don't understand how you can say this. The church is not against sexuality at all. Sex (in marriage) is Gods idea. The church is against all forms of sexual perversion or anything that demeans or diminishes people, relationships, or the distinct genders but NOT against sexual exploration with ones lifelong love male female union. All Christian churches, while they may disagree on the secondary issues (modes of baptism, forms of church government) they all agree on the essential clear teachings of the Bible (Jesus is God on the one end, and one is saved by Gods grace through faith in Christ on the other end).
No... they don't. This idea suggests there only two states of being:Non-religious people refuse to conform to a religion...
If you found it insulting, then I sincerely apologize. That was not my intent at all. The truth of the matter is, I was being exceptionally careful not to insult anyone. I didn't choose the word "sheep", the bible did. And I wasn't suggesting Christians are sheep, only that religion often speaks of its followers as such. Congregations are often referred to as "flocks", Christ is often referred to as the "Shepperd", etc.So, when you say that "Christianity teaches total conformity" (which is a vague insult implying all Christians are mere sheep without their own brains)....
No... I'm not. While this may be difficult for you to accept, my mindset has nothing do with your faith. It is your faith. And while it may be easier for you to view me in terms of your faith, as being either Christian or anti-Christian, that is your paradigm, not mine. And I am not required to live my life within the context of your paradigm....you yourself are conforming to an anti-Christian mindset.
* Pellaz sadly puts the microwave popcorn back in its box.
Not a bad idea. Though, I almost never check the lounge. I should.Zod, perhaps we ought to have a Nonbelievers thread in the Lounge.
Anyone heard the new Believer yet? So far I'm not feeling it.
I think I'm going to take this as my queue to bow out of this thread. The thread has reached a point where it can't end anywhere good. So with that in mind... cheers.
Zod
I'm disappointed in it.
Dominick... I think you misunderstood the intent of my "bowing out". My intent was never intended to ignore people I disagree with. On the contrary, I often find conversations with people I disagree with, more interesting than conversations with people I completely agree with. However, religion is a touchy subject for many. And based on some of your comments, I'm guessing you feel strongly about your faith. There was simply no way I could address some of your points, without directly attacking your religion, which I have no desire to do. For instance, you wrote...Hey Zod. I respect you and you're right to disagree. Have no problem with it. Actually I welcome you to disagree as it shows you think, which is a good thing. Though I wouldn't have thought you the type of person who just doesn't talk to people you disagree with. Oh well.
The church is not against sexuality at all. Sex (in marriage) is Gods idea. The church is against all forms of sexual perversion or anything that demeans or diminishes people, relationships, or the distinct genders but NOT against sexual exploration with ones lifelong love male female union.