My point is, and you seem a perfect example of the people I'm commenting about, how do YOU know Corby is innocent, and that drugs were, in fact, planted in her bag?
You don't. Simple. No-one except Corby herself, and in the case there was an external source who planted them, the initial subject.
She could be 100% guilty (It's not the Australian court system, it is the Balinese people's, and according to them, she is). I mean, what person in their right mind wouldn't try their hardest to avoid potential jail/death sentences if found in her position?
Also, I wasn't comparing the trials, I was making reference to the sympathy plea's (even if they aren't upfront, they are evident).