14. The Skull – "The Endless Road Turns Dark"
Great album, was really surprised how much I liked it and kept coming back to it, coming away with new discoveries.
14. The Skull – "The Endless Road Turns Dark"
Dishonourable mentions
Angra – Ømni
I respect your opinion, but strongly disagree.
I suppose you talk about Alex Skolnick. One of the rules of this forum is no need for calling names or insults. Please abide by them.
They may have come a lot closer to the first three Howe albums if any of the band was there aside from Kurdt and Howe. This album is a huge disappointment to me. And I love. LOVE , the first three Howe albums, so much so that they have been in regular rotation for 25 years. This album has almost no darkness to it. The solos are very basic and lazy and for the most part sound the same, He sounds like he's channeling The Doors. Plus there is no cool standout bass.I agree with your assessment specially since some of the songs have a couple of bars recycled from old MC songs, but it wasn't a disappointment to me since I wasn't expecting more than what they delivered.
Sometimes people (fans) expect too much, these days I just listen and decide if I want or not to open the wallet for a certain album. The time to wait for bands that reunite or reboot themselves, to make great albums like those 20-30 years ago, has long gone for me.
Problem is, is that they are billing it as a return to form in every interview. And Kurdt is trashing a lot of bands alluding to how great he thinks he is. Many of the veteran bands have not only kept it up. But gotten even more ruthless. Flotsam's new stuff is killin it. If I band changes, whatever I can take it. But when you're saying it's as good as and like the old stuff when it clearly isn't. Well, that's not cool. And frankly underscores the contribution of the classic Howe line up. Again, in my opinion. If you like it. That's great. I'm genuinely happy for you.a) I hadn't read any interviews, so I trust your word on it. MC was never really a thrash band (a la Testament), they always dwelt (specially in the classic days) between US power metal and thrash, without falling in either slot completely. We had the discussion in this very forum many times throughout the years.
b) Actually I respect a lot that Kurdt has those two visions: Metal Church (power/thrash) and Presto Ballet (hard rock/prog). Kurdt always composed in MC even when he didn't play in the albums of the Howe era (I), so i think the composition problem is more due to aging, I can't expect a person to compose with the same passion/angst/love/hate when young than several years later.
My viewpoint.
Problem is, is that they are billing it as a return to form in every interview. And Kurdt is trashing a lot of bands alluding to how great he thinks he is. Many of the veteran bands have not only kept it up. But gotten even more ruthless. Flotsam's new stuff is killin it. If I band changes, whatever I can take it. But when you're saying it's as good as and like the old stuff when it clearly isn't. Well, that's not cool. And frankly underscores the contribution of the classic Howe line up. Again, in my opinion. If you like it. That's great. I'm genuinely happy for you.
@Slammed am I going out of my mind or did you forget to mention Black Majesty?
Here's mine, excluding all death, black, grind etc.
Oh okay fair enough, was just making sure since you're you know... ancient.
Nah. I liked that album, thought it was a really solid release from them but it was 3 (or 4) on my Aussie list and only one of the albums on my Aussie list actually made my top 10. It possibly could have gone in the HM's.
Told you there wasn't enough BM albums to make a top 10
Oh yeah, if it hadn't been under the MC name I wouldn't have a problem. Even in the MC name I'm only comparing it to the Howe albums. The Wayne and Monroe albums are completely different. But every interview is about the legacy of MC and how they can finally make music with more dynamics because Howe is back. I don't hear the dynamics on this album. There are not really any standout tracks to me. Just songs that sound like they were left over from XI. And for a reason. And to me this album is a thin addition. And not worthy of sitting beside Blessing, Human Factor and Hanging In The Balance. All you really need to do is put any of those albums on.Yes, it's the constant telling us that it was a return that sucked. Sure if one was inclined they could try to ignore all the press, they could say they don't read it and therefore don't make opinions based on what the rest of the metal community do. But lets face it we are all sitting here on a forum day in and day out discussing albums, bands and what goes on in metal. If we didn't read all that garbage on the news websites we wouldn't know albums were coming out. If we only relied on band/label websites to give us news we'd think every album was great. So we all have some influence from the press and to read that a band is producing stuff that is like their old stuff but ignoring those comments when they finally release something that is well below, that is selective at best.
If Damned If You Do was released under the banner of Kurdt and Howe Jam in the Garage it would be different because they aren't riding on the name and making old school fans believe they created something old school fans want. It wouldn't make the songs better or worse, but it wouldn't have diminished what was an old school legacy the two of them claimed to be upholding. Even if you don't want to admit to reading the press and have skipped over all the references to what they claimed they were doing, there is no old school fan that would favourably compare this to their classic material, material worthy of the name METAL CHURCH.
think you said you liked the autarcie too?
Exactly. Kurdt is too close. If they had gotten someone like Sneap or used Terry Date again. This would have been the comeback everyone deserved and hoped for.