One interesting contemporary philosophical argument about time and forms, is that of the more spiritual and philosophical Eternal Recurrence vs. the modern scientifically endorsed idea of progress.
Nietzsche says of his idea of eternal recurrence:
For time is infinite, but the things in time, the concrete bodies are finite.... Now, however long a time may pass, according to the eternal laws governing the combinations of this eternal play of repetition, all configurations that have previously existed on this earth must yet meet, attract, repulse, kiss, and corrupt each other again.... And thus it will happen one day that a man will be born again, just like me, and a woman will be born, just like Mary (Citation from Kaufmann's Translator's Introduction to The Gay Science, p. 16).
The Eternal Return is basically the theory that there is infinite time and a finite number of events, and eventually the events will recur again and again infinitely. Similar ideas abound in literature and Jung, as well as all Eastern Religions.
Yet there is that specter of progress. That capitalistic, Darwinian scientific idea that time is leading us somewhere: to progress, or new material things, greater scientific understanding, et cetera. A view shared by both Marx and a modern venture capitalist. This mechanistic, time and world-as-a-end idea is not only prevalent today, but it is the accepted view of time for all but a few aesthetes and dilletantes.
Thus, what are your views? Which side do you prefer? Is there an end, or is the world a cyclical place of changing forms?
Nietzsche says of his idea of eternal recurrence:
For time is infinite, but the things in time, the concrete bodies are finite.... Now, however long a time may pass, according to the eternal laws governing the combinations of this eternal play of repetition, all configurations that have previously existed on this earth must yet meet, attract, repulse, kiss, and corrupt each other again.... And thus it will happen one day that a man will be born again, just like me, and a woman will be born, just like Mary (Citation from Kaufmann's Translator's Introduction to The Gay Science, p. 16).
The Eternal Return is basically the theory that there is infinite time and a finite number of events, and eventually the events will recur again and again infinitely. Similar ideas abound in literature and Jung, as well as all Eastern Religions.
Yet there is that specter of progress. That capitalistic, Darwinian scientific idea that time is leading us somewhere: to progress, or new material things, greater scientific understanding, et cetera. A view shared by both Marx and a modern venture capitalist. This mechanistic, time and world-as-a-end idea is not only prevalent today, but it is the accepted view of time for all but a few aesthetes and dilletantes.
Thus, what are your views? Which side do you prefer? Is there an end, or is the world a cyclical place of changing forms?