You mean he's using statistics to back up a moral argument? That is unusual, I agree. But suggesting people just "stay married" is over-simplifying. I'm sure there's a lot of people who get divorced for stupid reasons, but most divorces have irreconcilible causes. Telling people in a failed relationship that they should just stay married is like telling a rape victim she should just have the baby.
From that article I didn't see him saying that people should stay married to fix global warming. He simply suggests that the lifestyle and behavioral attributes of two married persons living as individuals as opposed to as a couple increases their contribution. Yes, it's a simplistic view but it's - to my thinking at least - still accurate in its simplicity. It's not revolutionary vision by any means but it's hardly a proverbial last straw to use as grounds for writing him off as a mad-man.You mean he's using statistics to back up a moral argument? That is unusual, I agree. But suggesting people just "stay married" is over-simplifying.
Amen. Especially in Africa etc.I don't think he'd like this, but if he wants to save the planet, he should tell people to STOP HAVING FAMILIES. It's people full stop who are killing the world, not just those who are living independently. No people = good environment.