Captain Beard
No longer active
- Sep 6, 2001
- 28,010
- 99
- 48
From a horror movie.
- Thread starter Reminiscence
- Start date
Resonator
Member
- Apr 16, 2007
- 1,078
- 0
- 36
Wow. Was there any point to that article but to degrade the poor man?
In all honesty, I'm not convinced. There is not enough evidence to even make it look remotely like he murdered any of them. If you ask me, I'm betting his friend that testified against him did it. I mean, you don't just go "HURRRR HURRRR LOOK HOW I FEED PIGS FEMALE VAGINAS FROM A BLENDER" to someone, you know?
This stinks of bullshit. I demand a real investigation.
In all honesty, I'm not convinced. There is not enough evidence to even make it look remotely like he murdered any of them. If you ask me, I'm betting his friend that testified against him did it. I mean, you don't just go "HURRRR HURRRR LOOK HOW I FEED PIGS FEMALE VAGINAS FROM A BLENDER" to someone, you know?
This stinks of bullshit. I demand a real investigation.
Lord Foul
I don't spank men
To assume that because you haven't seen or heard the evidence, that there is no evidence, is a strange leap of logic.
Resonator
Member
- Apr 16, 2007
- 1,078
- 0
- 36
I don't assume anything. I know what is and what isn't, and this isn't right. SOMETHING is not quite OK with this whole ordeal. What evidence could they possibly have besides a testimony of a friend who probably hates him and some corpses? Is there proof that he actually fed them to his pigs? Is there proof that it was him who accomplished this whole task?
Logic solves nothing. Rationalization is a weak point for anyone.
Logic solves nothing. Rationalization is a weak point for anyone.
Lord Foul
I don't spank men
You suggest a system of justice predicated on "gut feeling" rather than reasoned arguments? Sadly, this is often how a jury actually works, at least in this country. I have no experience with Canadian juries. If this man is convicted without evidence, as you say, then it would be only the "gut feeling" of his peers that put him in prison.
All I am suggesting is that forming an opinion on a case you are not involved in the investigation or criminal proceedings of, based on information gleaned from internet news sources, is somewhat silly.
All I am suggesting is that forming an opinion on a case you are not involved in the investigation or criminal proceedings of, based on information gleaned from internet news sources, is somewhat silly.
I think what our friend might be trying to say is that while logic and reasoning may be the most obvious solution to any problem, the facts themselves are debatable and thus using FALSE logic and reasoning is an offense against all logic and reasoning altogether.
DarkNoise
Grotesque Butchery Rabbit
And ours makes any more sense? "I sentence you to ten life terms in prison!"
What the fuck, is the person gonna be revived every time he/she dies to continue serving it? .. I believe once it passes a full life term without parole it should move right up to the death penalty. And no more waiting in line, just have mass executions and stop wasting our fucking money supporting the lives of such sick degenerates (those on this board are exempt.
.... and yet another series of murders connected to someone in the Pacific Northwest USA / Southwest Canada area.... why am I not surprised?
Must be something in our water.
