I'm struggling with the last 6 weeks worldwide.
Bear in mind that money is created through the debt process, and that it is only the continual "growth of the economy" that can pay off the interest on the debt that turns debt money into money.
RBA were being pussies trying to control growth, "boiling the frog" with 1/4% today, and another 1/4% tomorrow...at the time, I was thinking stick it to us with a full %, or even 1/2%. By the time that the frog reacted, it was cooked.
Government were hanging onto the surplus, which I understood was a good thing. Whenever there is an expansion of money supply, inflation goes up. Tax cuts or pay outs made inflation...Govt should hold the surplus.
Would have liked it if they built a new "Snowy" equivalent to shift water, move cotton and rice production out of the country, or foster the hydrology of that bloke who makes Gerry Harvey's farm green (Harvey can rot 'though).
Sub Prime hits, and they start the bailouts.
IAG (US) receive $87B, and celebrate with a $440,000 party by the execs, lasting a week. Another big wig yank gets $21M pay for 18 days.
Something stinks.
US Bailout becomes $1T, with the govt becoming part owners (nationalisation ?). Banks need the bailout for "liquidity", which they don't plan to release for another 4-6 months (WTF are they doing with it currently ?...paying divvies ?)
Why aren't the banks brought back to public service wages if they are owned by the Gov ?
US rescue package rescues the banks, why not the property owners ?
Now we've got our own $10B of handouts, which need to be spent to stimulate the economy.
Has inflation just been cut loose from growth ?
Since when did Australians need money to spend money ?
I just don't get it.
'cept it's going to cost us at the supermarket big time, tax time big time, and a bit less for a DVD player while Gerry will "cut back on his margins" and keep DVD players cheap.