I HAVE ONE THING TO SAY

Gums

sweet bitching
Jan 9, 2002
1,733
51
48
41
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
You all, all of you, all

WHere are you. I'm drunk and I don't drink much anywmore. Thanks to those who answered me on aim, sorry froshc i didn't ge tback to you in time

to be ohoenst hoenest i've drueled more tonight than etver , i can't account for my actions but basically i'm trying to get more down my throwat than i can manage.

ok let me explain my situation, i've moved acoss the country cause the real money is in ablberta.. that's where the oil is and its a rich province. so it s htough being here alone but i can tough it out. good luck skyfire good ricddacne

enojoy it you goddman sluts, who the hell is here anyways. you better post or i'll hbe raging :headbang: ttyl
 
Gums said:
You all, all of you, all

WHere are you. I'm drunk and I don't drink much anywmore. Thanks to those who answered me on aim, sorry froshc i didn't ge tback to you in time

to be ohoenst hoenest i've drueled more tonight than etver , i can't account for my actions but basically i'm trying to get more down my throwat than i can manage.

ok let me explain my situation, i've moved acoss the country cause the real money is in ablberta.. that's where the oil is and its a rich province. so it s htough being here alone but i can tough it out. good luck skyfire good ricddacne

enojoy it you goddman sluts, who the hell is here anyways. you better post or i'll hbe raging :headbang: ttyl

I feel that the central tenets of your thesis are irrefutably self-evident. However, I suggest that, in order to present a more logially structured empirical hierarchy of evidence in support of your doctrine, you re-examine the chronological development of your ideological supposition and instead utilize a post-reconstructionist technique of sequencing according to relevance to aforementioned thesis and subsequent concepts.