Hi Andy and everyone,
I am about to record the guitar tracks for my CD but before proceeding I really feel I should ask your valuable opinions and maybe help before doing something wrong and ruining everything... So I recorded a small section with different setups so I could decide which one is the best. You can download (please) the results of my experiments here :
http://tinoo.free.fr/guitar.mp3 (it's 2.25Mo).
While you're downloading, let me explain my configuration. First, I recorded the guitar with a D.I. into the computer, and then sent this back to the amp for reamping, so all tracks come from one source, I played once, it's not doubled. I have a Vetta amp. For those who don't know, and you must be numberous, this is a simulating amp, based on computer chips (by Line 6, I guess most of you know the POD, only the Vetta is way better). One feature of the amp is to allow you to use two different amps at the same time, so my sound setup is a Peavey 5150 emulation for Amp 1, a Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifier for Amp 2, in stereo (one amp each side) both fed by a Tube Screamer stomp box simulation. I tried the line out recording, but it sucks for big metal sounds, so I dropped the idea. Another feature of this amp is the Double Tracker function. It slightly modifies the timing, tuning and dynamics of your playing to send to Amp 2, so that it's almost as if the part you are playing was already double tracked. It sounds really cool and wide in the room, but I found it a little "flangy" when trying to record and doing my tests.
So you must have finished downloading the mp3 by now, let me explain what it contains... There are 6 different clips of the same part played with different mic and amp configurations. Here we go :
All of these are mono since this will be panned left (or right) and mixed with another amp in the end by the other guitar player of the band (Mesa Boogie Triaxis). And don't worry about the clipping, these must come from the mp3 encoding, I don't have it when listening through Cubase.
I applied a few EQ to the tracks, mainly cutting bellow 80Hz, slightly boosting middle range around 600Hz in some cases, cutting at 10KHz too, and boosting above 12KHz. I also applied Andy's setting for multiband compressor around 120-250Hz.
I'm really having a hard time trying to figure out which one is the best, if any of them are good at all actually, and I do believe that this is the place I'll get the best help with fresh ears and capable metal producers who have already heard guitar tracks alone, I mean not in a mix and mastered, but rough... So I can wait to read your opinions, advices and criticisms, and maybe this will not only help me but other people in here too I hope.
Thank you all in advance,
Cheers,
Brett
P.S. : Sorry for this loooooooooooong and boring thread
I am about to record the guitar tracks for my CD but before proceeding I really feel I should ask your valuable opinions and maybe help before doing something wrong and ruining everything... So I recorded a small section with different setups so I could decide which one is the best. You can download (please) the results of my experiments here :
http://tinoo.free.fr/guitar.mp3 (it's 2.25Mo).
While you're downloading, let me explain my configuration. First, I recorded the guitar with a D.I. into the computer, and then sent this back to the amp for reamping, so all tracks come from one source, I played once, it's not doubled. I have a Vetta amp. For those who don't know, and you must be numberous, this is a simulating amp, based on computer chips (by Line 6, I guess most of you know the POD, only the Vetta is way better). One feature of the amp is to allow you to use two different amps at the same time, so my sound setup is a Peavey 5150 emulation for Amp 1, a Mesa Boogie Dual Rectifier for Amp 2, in stereo (one amp each side) both fed by a Tube Screamer stomp box simulation. I tried the line out recording, but it sucks for big metal sounds, so I dropped the idea. Another feature of this amp is the Double Tracker function. It slightly modifies the timing, tuning and dynamics of your playing to send to Amp 2, so that it's almost as if the part you are playing was already double tracked. It sounds really cool and wide in the room, but I found it a little "flangy" when trying to record and doing my tests.
So you must have finished downloading the mp3 by now, let me explain what it contains... There are 6 different clips of the same part played with different mic and amp configurations. Here we go :
* Part I (0:00) : Recorded with a SM-57, both amp coming out of the same speaker.
* Part II (0:24) : same SM-57, with only Amp 1 coming out from the speaker.
* Part III (0:49) : same SM-57 on the same speaker, but this time with only Amp 2 coming out.
* Part IV (1:13) : Now Amp 1 & 2 mixed (Part II & III if you prefer).
* Part V (1:38) : Only Amp 2 from another speaker with a SM-58 'turned into' a SM-57 (removed the grille... though the sound is really different...), with Double Tracker enabled (so the part is slightly different than the original one).
* Part VI (2:03) : Amp 1 with 57 (aka Part II) and Amp 2 with 58 (aka Part V) mixed together.
* Part II (0:24) : same SM-57, with only Amp 1 coming out from the speaker.
* Part III (0:49) : same SM-57 on the same speaker, but this time with only Amp 2 coming out.
* Part IV (1:13) : Now Amp 1 & 2 mixed (Part II & III if you prefer).
* Part V (1:38) : Only Amp 2 from another speaker with a SM-58 'turned into' a SM-57 (removed the grille... though the sound is really different...), with Double Tracker enabled (so the part is slightly different than the original one).
* Part VI (2:03) : Amp 1 with 57 (aka Part II) and Amp 2 with 58 (aka Part V) mixed together.
All of these are mono since this will be panned left (or right) and mixed with another amp in the end by the other guitar player of the band (Mesa Boogie Triaxis). And don't worry about the clipping, these must come from the mp3 encoding, I don't have it when listening through Cubase.
I applied a few EQ to the tracks, mainly cutting bellow 80Hz, slightly boosting middle range around 600Hz in some cases, cutting at 10KHz too, and boosting above 12KHz. I also applied Andy's setting for multiband compressor around 120-250Hz.
I'm really having a hard time trying to figure out which one is the best, if any of them are good at all actually, and I do believe that this is the place I'll get the best help with fresh ears and capable metal producers who have already heard guitar tracks alone, I mean not in a mix and mastered, but rough... So I can wait to read your opinions, advices and criticisms, and maybe this will not only help me but other people in here too I hope.
Thank you all in advance,
Cheers,
Brett
P.S. : Sorry for this loooooooooooong and boring thread