General Zod
Ruler of Australia
I don't think we're actually disagreeing, I think your missing my point (or maybe I'm missing yours). If Kamelot wants to write the same record over and over again, that's their right. And if they're successful in that endeavor, all the better for them. I also agree that sticking with a winning formula is a significantly better career strategy than constantly reinventing yourself. My ONLY point in this, is that Kamelot ARE in fact writing the same record over and over again and subsequently NOT exploring their art.Here's another perspective on that. You can be a band which releases discs people want to hear and have a lengthy and successful career. Or you can be a band that puts out two or three discs exploring your art and then breaks up because they aren't making enough money to buy bologna, much less bread.
I'd also add luck to that list.So is that all that writing pop hits is in your opinion? Just marketing strategy and makeup and nothing more? Zero musical creativity?
Do I think the actual songwriters who write these hit songs are talented? Some are, some aren't. I think untalented people can stumble onto a hit. Those who can write hit songs with consistency clearly have a talent. Appealing to the lowest common denominator is not easy. If it was, everyone would do it. But if you're asking me if I think the Pop hits that litter the Billboard charts are the result of great songwriting or marketing and makeup? My answer is, by and large, marketing and makeup. It's not by coincidence that it's impossible to distinguish the red carpet at the Grammys from a Paris fashion show runway.
Again, I feel as though we're not communicating clearly. To develop an original, successful signature sound takes talent and vision. But once you've developed it, you can do one of two things; stagnate within that sound or explore that sound. If you want to write the same record over and over again and collect your checks, go for it. Those are the rewards of hitting upon a signature sound. However... you don't get to do so without people pointing out that's what you're doing. It's not an unfair criticism to point out that Kamelot is writing the same record over and over again, it's an accurate assessment.Ok. Let's approach this from another angle. Let's take the band Boston as an example. Unquestionably one of THE biggest classic rock bands in the history of the genre. But if ever there was a band which wrote according to formula, it was Boston. I would argue that their music is the very definition of "signature sound". Does that fact alone invalidate their music?