maybe i just don't understand why people are saying that? ic has been extremely transparent about this situation and exactly where the money is going and what they are trying to achieve.
there are a lot of "organizations" that are very un-organized (as it were) but ic has been fairly articulate in their efforts to be heard.
i would like to think i am a reasonable person with a relatively open mind however i am unable to follow any negative assertion regarding this campaign or the organization. it's not very difficult to research this entity's priority. if everyone understands that this is a real problem and the organization is exposing it to a public that might have been (at one point) completely unaware of it, what is the problem with the organization?
all charities are flawed because they are organized and operated by people. maybe the previous work of this organization has been imperfect but i don't think that echoes the idea of this project we are talking about. someone sitting behind a computer spouting scams and shenanigans at a legitimate operation is moreso a "piece of shit" as this does not produce a fundamental argument, it is just hearsay.
if the this organization is truly a "piece of shit" the people that believe this and have proof of it should come out from behind their blogs of misinformation and expose the fraud to the public media. but i have gathered in the last 3 months (or so) this group is legit, the problem is legit and the support has been overwhelming.
http://visiblechildren.tumblr.com/ said:]Invisible Children has been condemned time and time again. As a registered not-for-profit, its finances are public. Last year, the organization spent $8,676,614. Only 32% went to direct services (page 6), with much of the rest going to staff salaries, travel and transport, and film production.
Again, everyone totally agrees the situation regarding Kony is real - that's not the issue. Spending ~$2M on the situation and ~$6M on creating awareness for it is fucking retarded - that's the issue.
I don't quite understand this argument. Even if they did spend $6 million on all their videos (11 iirc, so let's say $1 million on this latest one?), given the reaction its gotten I'd say its well spent, and may do more than if they'd spent it quietly helping out. I'm NOT saying I agree with them, or whatevers going on because as usual the truth is an odd shade of grey. But attacking them for spending lots of money on a video that has had a pretty incredible reaction is an odd thing to do - chances are they're going to regain all the money they spent on that, and then some, and get a fuckton more aid than they would have already.
Because IC has been doing it for a few years now... Sure the videos are great and get tons of attention and lots of donations. Donations which they continuously mismanage and end up spending the majority on salary and more film making, among other things - instead of spending the majority on the cause.
Oh and, you know, the whole fact of the matter that they made a video presenting some issues in Uganda that haven't been present since 2006 to get more donations to mismanage.
...I'm just going to leave this here for a sec. Feel free to lol.
http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/16/jason-russell-video-naked-meltdown-kony/