UndoControl said:
And yes, 'tis a pity that everyone agrees and gives one- or two-word answers. :\
this is what we should do: we pick a random regular and he has to come up with some awkward and uninformed bullshit supporting the other opinion. then the rest of us reply with sensible arguments proving him wrong and we feel very smart about it, because everybody knows that winning at the internet is like winning at life.
if it gets out of hand, however, i will have to start limiting the use of sassy, provocative emoticons to a quota per person (for instance, no one will be allowed to use more than two
through the whole debate, because they're so irritating everyone who uses them is automatically a master in irony and sarcasm), and i might even go all the way and prohibit image macros as comebacks.
we will at some point conclude that the dissenting opinion is held by a "moron" with serious grammar/logic issues, whose intervention on this board has had the entertaining effect of soliciting some meaningful debate, but who is at the same time so pathetically ignorant that we feel that a small part of everybody's soul has died with every word we have wasted trying to force some sense into him. in his last post on this forum, he will accuse a certain number of us to "take the internet too seriously".
the next scripted event will be: scene-whore relates sexual adventures with area band member(s), said band member denies everything and calls her a buttertroll.