So that tells me that anyone with the caption of ironMaiden will probably get their picture pulled.
I agree its not just album covers, although I did find the killers album cover still on there.
If I take a photograph of somethign that does not detail copyrighted material, I have the rights to post the picture where I see fit.
Taking an image of a plaque obviously aimed at tourism is not taking a picture of copyrighted material.
This leads me to beleive that Photobucket have been heavy handed or imposed their search in a rather draconian style. But then again, it could also link back to the wording the legal team sent. Removal of all iron maiden copyrighted material.......
......having said that ironmaiden holdings seem to be rather lax in their interpretation of what is and what isnt fair.
www.ironandthemaidens.com resulted in a court case, citing "Ironmaiden have been a succesfull band since 1975". Well the ironmaiden was a torture device used before 1975 so I suggest iron maiden cease and desist the use of their name. pfffftttt :Smug:
We have to remember that ironmaiden holdings are a corporation setup to look after the interests of the group, they are not necessarily the group. They also dont necessarily represent the views of the group themselves.
Remember ironmaiden holdings announced publically that Iron maiden were going to leave sanctuary.