Metallica pulling a Pearl Jam (well kinda)

Record Company: Lars, you know, St.Wanker dropped off the Billboard charts
2 months ago and the sales are a disappointing 1.5 million.
With all of the Studio expenses, we're taking a serious
Financial loss here.

Lars: Sucks like a mo'fucka doesn't it? I had to hold off on my next fucking
Porsche and douche-y art painting.

Record Company: Lars, That's unfortunate but, what I am saying is, WE
NEED TO MAKE SOME MONEY. WHAT WILL WE DO?

Lars: I know! Let's sell our fucking bootlegs to our fans! We can make more
money on that than on St.Wanker because there's 20-fucking
something songs on a fucking live show and only 10 fucking
songs on St. Wanker! We can charge even more fucking money
if we get Kwirk to do a long ass solo!

Plus, you can only buy St.Wanker one time but you can a bootleg of all of our
shows and we do like fucking 30 shows! That's 30 bootlegs!


Record Company: Lars, That's brilliant! Your fans will be fooled into thinking
you're doing this for them because you care about your
fans and we can sucker them into paying more money
buying it from you than what they were paying from
the bootleggers! Genius Lars! Genius!
 
Lol! Hmmmm lars may be money hungry. That is debatable. The idea is fn great and I will be sure to burn a couple cd's. Let your anger subside my brutha. Your name afterall is "Ofiicer Nice"
 
Didn't Metallica sue Napster for doing something somewhat similar to that? Oh that's right, they weren't making any $$$.

BTW, somewhat unrelated, but last night I had this weird dream where Metallica was really heavy and really good again, and were performing in my living room, and at my school. One more dream that will never come true.
 
Officer Nice said:
Record Company: Lars, you know, St.Wanker dropped off the Billboard charts
2 months ago and the sales are a disappointing 1.5 million.
With all of the Studio expenses, we're taking a serious
Financial loss here.

Lars: Sucks like a mo'fucka doesn't it? I had to hold off on my next fucking
Porsche and douche-y art painting.

Record Company: Lars, That's unfortunate but, what I am saying is, WE
NEED TO MAKE SOME MONEY. WHAT WILL WE DO?

Lars: I know! Let's sell our fucking bootlegs to our fans! We can make more
money on that than on St.Wanker because there's 20-fucking
something songs on a fucking live show and only 10 fucking
songs on St. Wanker! We can charge even more fucking money
if we get Kwirk to do a long ass solo!

Plus, you can only buy St.Wanker one time but you can a bootleg of all of our
shows and we do like fucking 30 shows! That's 30 bootlegs!


Record Company: Lars, That's brilliant! Your fans will be fooled into thinking
you're doing this for them because you care about your
fans and we can sucker them into paying more money
buying it from you than what they were paying from
the bootleggers! Genius Lars! Genius!


HAHA!! Love it!! This is so completely true...money grubbin' bastards!!
 
Razorhead95 said:
Didn't Metallica sue Napster for doing something somewhat similar to that?
no...

Metallica sued them because an unfinished song appeared while they were still in the studio....they then noticed that you could get all their studio albums.....that's why they sued them....Metallica has never had anything against bootleg trading and have stated so many times...but some people are too stupid to see the difference between a bootleg and a studio album, as this argument comes up all the time....
 
^The right idea.

I fail to see how this is a bad thing. More music = more goodness, provided you like the band. If you don't, whoopedy-do, don't buy it. Problem solved. If Testament was doing this, everyone would be all over their nuts (rightfully so).

And even Deadly admit that Metallica still kicks ass live.
 
AllWithinMyMonster said:
Lol! Hmmmm lars may be money hungry. That is debatable. The idea is fn great and I will be sure to burn a couple cd's. Let your anger subside my brutha. Your name afterall is "Ofiicer Nice"

Are you actually being serious with me? It's debatable that Lars is money
hungry?

Have you heard about the new house Lars is building? His old cheap 5 million
dollar house isn't enough. He sold off a bunch of his douche-y art paintings
because they were at peak value and he knew he could get more money
into building his Bill Gates wannabe mansion.

Lars is completely money hungry. He's admitted for the last few years
he is not metal, does not want to be metal AND DOES NOT EVEN
LISTEN TO METAL.

They ARE MONEYTALLICA.

It's shameless.
 
Officer Nice said:
Have you heard about the new house Lars is building? His old cheap 5 million
dollar house isn't enough.
actually Lars sold his old house years ago and built a new house then....

right now it is James who is selling his house and building a new one.....


(i like how you just blatantly make up shit to bash Metallica with.....if you're gonna do it, at least use facts and not shit pulled out of your ass.....)
 
xAm_I_Evilx said:
actually Lars sold his old house years ago and built a new house then....
That's the one I am talking about.
I read about it.

(i like how you just blatantly make up shit to bash Metallica with.....if you're gonna do it, at least use facts and not shit pulled out of your ass.....)
Hey dork, *ding ding* school's in. Grab some wood and get schooled.

1. I made nothing up. It is true Lars sold a house and built a bigger more
expensive one. It is true Lars sold some of his paintings to garner more
cash for the house.

2. Therefore, because I everything I said was true, I was sticking to facts,
and hence, I was not blatantly making anything up. Simple logic, if it
is true, it is not false. If it is true, it did happen.

At worst, I forgot about the timeframe because I'm old and I have a
busy, chaotic life. Bite it.

3. I don't need to pull anything out of my arse to bash Metallica, they
give me enough ammo time after time, year after year.

Therefore your argument is weak and you can go back to licking Lars' balls.

Class dismissed.
 
Officer Nice said:
That's the one I am talking about.
I read about it.

Hey dork, *ding ding* school's in. Grab some wood and get schooled.

1. I made nothing up. It is true Lars sold a house and built a bigger more
expensive one. It is true Lars sold some of his paintings to garner more
cash for the house.

2. Therefore, because I everything I said was true, I was sticking to facts,
and hence, I was not blatantly making anything up. Simple logic, if it
is true, it is not false. If it is true, it did happen.

At worst, I forgot about the timeframe because I'm old and I have a
busy, chaotic life. Bite it.

3. I don't need to pull anything out of my arse to bash Metallica, they
give me enough ammo time after time, year after year.

Therefore your argument is weak and you can go back to licking Lars' balls.

Class dismissed.

no....you said the new house Lars is building

but he's had the house for years....

therefore using common sense you = wrong.....except i expect you are one of those people you can't ever admit that they are wrong....even when it is blatantly obvious....

if you would have asked if he heard about the house Lars got a while back it would have been true....but the way you said it sounds like "Lars just sold his house and is getting a new one" which is false....