Moony

I could be wrong but that looks much more unattracive that she is i'm sure. But then it is a pose that would be hard to look attractive in, especially when you are that thin.

I have decided that I really dislike the FHM shoots. I was looking at their calendar at someone's house today and realised that every one looked highly stylised and fake, but not even fake in a good hide the blemishes way, just fake in an unnatural and unattractive way.
 
Having Nicky Webster in FHM is just wrong, wrong wrong. I had the same reaction when that Bec Cartwright was in it. It's like some Japanese schoolgirl fetish.
 
Stonewall said:
I could be wrong but that looks much more unattracive that she is i'm sure. But then it is a pose that would be hard to look attractive in, especially when you are that thin.
Click to expand...

You have to remember that she's a bloodnut, so her complexion is likely to be terrible, and under photography lights I'm surprised you couldn't see her skeleton.
 
Winmar said:
It's like some Japanese schoolgirl fetish.
Click to expand...

except that neither of them are japanese.

I dig what you're getting at though. It's like they put 17 year old chicks in revealing outfits and 'sexy' poses in men's magazines.. and that's all good. Not to mention all the teen popstarlets cavorting around in their knickers in video clips.

But if you FUCK a 17 year old that you know somehow... with her consent, even in a relationship or whatever... you're a monster that needs to be locked up and kept away from children for the rest of your life.

I think there's some inconsistancy there.
 
TinMan666 said:
But if you FUCK a 17 year old that you know somehow... with her consent, even in a relationship or whatever... you're a monster that needs to be locked up and kept away from children for the rest of your life.
Click to expand...

I'm in definate agreeance if there's a massive age difference, don't get me wrong.

Although what is your, or anyone's, opinion on a smaller age difference, say 19 and 17?
 
Goreripper said:
The age of consent is 16.
Click to expand...

but i think that only counts if you're not more than 2 years older than her, or something?

So say... 21 and 16 could get you in trouble.

Actually a guy I did my security course told me he got in some shit for something like that and he was only 18 or 19 if i remember correctly.
 
Yeah, what Gore said, age of consent is 16, and as far as I know the 2 year thing only applies when one of the parties is under 16.

The rest is up to your conscience.

And I didn't realise Nikki was a redhead, that makes more sense now.
 
Stonewall said:
And I didn't realise Nikki was a redhead, that makes more sense now.
Click to expand...

That's how distorted the photo is! :)

I don't think I've ever been with anyone younger than me, so I think I'm safe.
 
It wasn't because of the photo that I didn't realise she was a red head, just because everytime I have seen her since 2000 I think she has been blonde. Maybe I haven't been paying enough attention. Sorry Nikki.
 
TinMan666 said:
but i think that only counts if you're not more than 2 years older than her, or something?

So say... 21 and 16 could get you in trouble.

Actually a guy I did my security course told me he got in some shit for something like that and he was only 18 or 19 if i remember correctly.
Click to expand...

Yeah could be. I was with a girl who was 13 years younger than me at one point, but her parents were actually cool with it so it was ok.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MetalAges
LAUREN HARRIS Featured In FHM Magazine; Photos Available
Replies
0
Views
187
Metal News 2
MetalAges
M
phlogiston
Moonchild?
Replies
28
Views
588
Maiden Downunder
spawn
S
MetalAges
VOLBEAT Frontman Hired To Write For Danish FHM Magazine
Replies
0
Views
222
Metal News 2
MetalAges
M
Spiff
Dungeon!!!!!!!!!
Replies
33
Views
706
Maiden Downunder
Lord Tim
L
MetalAges
AC/DC - Behind-The-Scenes Video From Black Ice Photo Shoot Available
Replies
0
Views
209
Metal News 2
MetalAges
M
Top Bottom
Back