I love the new album way more than the other one and I totally belive that Peter's better than the guy from Opeth and the band as a whole sound way better. 
New better than old
- Thread starter Necro 666
- Start date
I love them both. They´re so different from each other, it´s like two different bands, and I totally love both styles.
Jinn
Saint
Necro 666 said:I love the new album way more than the other one and I totally belive that Peter's better than the guy from Opeth and the band as a whole sound way better.
Lord_AgathoN
LIKE FIRE....
RTC will become an everdeath ........people will still praise it in 15 years....its such a damn killer from the first to the last second.....
stefan86
invariably off-topic
Baletempest
Singer of Strange Songs
NMF just gets my vote as the better of the 2, only just, Pete's vocals are amazing but I preffer Mikaels, however the drumming is better of NMF, theres more of it (12 tracks, you rarely see that in Death Metal nowadays) and is that little bit more varied.
Everything Bloodbath does is pure Darkened genius, its exactly what Death Metal should be, Technical, Varied, Burtal and Evil as fuck \m/
Everything Bloodbath does is pure Darkened genius, its exactly what Death Metal should be, Technical, Varied, Burtal and Evil as fuck \m/
L0bster
OneTwo!
Jinn
Saint
One Winged Angel
Tägtgren Follower
WhiteBeastofWotan
Apostitutes!
One Winged Angel
Tägtgren Follower
Jinn
Saint
One Winged Angel said:
Dude, Peter's growl is too high. He just can't achieve that beastly low end that Mike can. Mike is just that much better. Given he can't hit a high growl as easily as Peter, but he more than makes up for it with his clean voice.
Demoke
This is the Almighty:
Lord_AgathoN
LIKE FIRE....
LoL .......its also a question of own taste. I hate what peter does with hypocrisy(especially new ones).....these growls that change high and low like dunno.........Mikaels growls are just insane. My throat bleeded by just listening to rtc for the first time.....or take Breeding Death
One Winged Angel
Tägtgren Follower
There are a few things I've noticed about their two styles of growling. Here I will objectively compare them, but in the end people should just choose which one they like best based on which one appeals to them more, for whatever personal reason they have.Jinn said:
Here goes nothing:
1. Peter has more range, and can do more with his growl
2. Mike has a more consistant, lower growl
3. Peter's growl is just as beastly as Mike's
3. Mike's clean vocals should not be taken into consideration, as this is a discussion of Bloodbath/growls
4. Peter can actually achieve a low end growl like Mike's, and because it is more raspy, it is actually more beastly than Mikes
5. The reason Peter doesn't spend his entire time in Bloodbath at a low end growl is because he realizes that it's very boring and would show a lot less emotion/scariness
6. Peter is scary and evil but Mike is cuddly like a teddy bear
7. Peter's hair is nicer than Mike's
8. Although Mike outweighs Peter, Peter can still kick Mike's ass because it's mostly fat anyway
9. Mike is chubby
10. If their growls could take possesion of 100 foot tall robot warriors, Peter's robot would destroy Mike's simply because there is just that much more to Peter's growl
11. Peter's growl is better
12. Everyone should like Peter's growl more, because it's better
13. Only little girls like Mike's growl better anyway
So now that we all have the facts straight, it should be a lot easier for people to decide between these two great styles of growling.
ColdDarkNord
www.bragin.cz
Similar threads
