SocialNumb
Damn Christians!
I read somewhere (wish I still had the link) that normalizing destroys dynamics. Any truth to this?
				
			Re: reamping
I've erred on the side of safety to avoid clipping and recorded direct guitar/bass tracks at volumes that end up being pretty low. Sometimes I normalized them to give more volume, which means less is needed from the amp's gain.
But if you normalize several DI tracks in a project, each will be normalized to its own highest peak, right? So the different tracks might be at different volumes afterwards...
I don't think so because normalizing just takes the highest peak in the file and raises the volume of the whole file an equal amount to get the highest peak to be at 0db... So everything is proportionally identical dynamically...
never.
bob katz will kill you
Bob Katz said:Normalizing is just changing gain under a mysterious name.
Bob Katz said:In general, normalization should be avoided. In my book I cover this in more detail, but basically, once a track has already been recorded, you do not gain any quality by changing its gain, you only lose quality by requantizing it. If you are mixing it, you are going to be changing the gain once again anyway, so why do an extra quality-reducing DSP step prior to mixing?
something i've tried recently: i used the gain poti on the cubase sx mixer (right above the fader) to make ever channel hit 0db if the fader is set to zero. is that good or bad? i just figured thats what i'd be doing if i was mixing live...

if a track is just recorded too low and you need the fader at +12 for it to be of any use
