One has to assume that neither Pakistan or India has "Neutron Bombs". I am doubtful if America or Russia even has 'em. There was talk about this back in Reagan's heyday. The theory was that it would be less explosive but more radioactive. The idea was to kill everyone without doing as much damage to the infrastructure. I don't think they ever got into production on these things.
I did a paper in college on Nuclear war, and one thing that I do remember very clearly, is that cataclysmic global changes could result from even a "limited" nuclear scenario. At the time the USSR and USA had thousands upon thousands of bombs aimed at one another. If I remember correctly, if only 3% of those were to be exploded in certain areas, our extinction was a definite possibility.
Made for some fun research, let me tell you.
This is why I feel that if we have to root out Saddam, so be it. There may be some terrible loss of life, but what happens when these weapons get in the wrong hands? Instead of 3000 people dead, it could be 3 million. And it could just as easily be Paris, London, or Moscow.
I wish everyone could see that!
When the fanatics don't care about themselves, and "God" is telling them to kill the unbelievers, anything goes. It's a scary world out there children.
I don't want to be seen as a warmonger, but these are some strange times, we are living. I don't believe that we should all "fall in line" with the President, and back him 100% of the time. However, we have to assume he has a whole lot more information in his hands to make these decisions!
I just hope there is no "next time", like a lot of people are saying. It could be much, much worse!
Enough to make ya wanna
uke:
uke:
uke:
uke:
uke: