Ozzy suing Iommi

it was the same deal with pink floyd. waters wanted gilmour to drop the name but gilmour felt that he would be better off with the band name...AND playing water's tunes and singing his lyrics.

im pro-waters, you can tell.
 
Besides the first comment, this one is also gold:



First off, fuck Ozzy.

Second off, if he wants everyone to own it collectively why is he suing for 50% of the rights?

Third off, why do this now when they are touring as Heaven & Hell and not during the Headless Cross era?

Fourth off, fuck Ozzy.
 
I'm not a fan of Ozzy anyway. I'm yet to check the Heaven & Hell album btw. but I think I gotta do that soon. I like Dio.
 
I'm just saying, but....
Ozzy is saying he wants 25 per cent, or equal ownership with the other band members.
Tony is saying Ozzy wants 50 per cent.
Meanwhile, Tony is getting 100 per cent! ?
I'm sorry dudes, but gotta go with Ozzy on this one... :)
 
The first Sabbath album I ever heard was Live Evil...
Afterwards, discovered Ozzy and loved that too.
But gotta say, I have a strong bias for Sabbath with Dio - what an awesome lineup!
Anyone not familiar with 'Heaven and Hell' or 'Mob Rules' - check out these albums. In many ways, they eclipsed the earlier Ozzy stuff...
 
Prophet178 hit the nail on the head. This has Sharon's fingerprints all over it.

"Throughout the last 12 years, it was my management representatives who oversaw the marketing and quality control of the "Black Sabbath" brand through OZZFEST, touring, merchandising and album reissues."

Hi Sharon! LOL.