- Feb 20, 2005
- 19,930
- 1
- 36
So I'm planning my future purposes, and am planning on getting a Digimax of some sort to augment my semi-soon-to-be-purchased Fireface. In investigating the range, though, I'm somewhat confused as to the differences between the Digimax FS and LT.
So naturally, one would think the LT would be better, if nothing else because it costs $800 while the FS is $600. But the odd thing is, they don't really seem to be related to one another. For example, the FS has two ADAT ins and outs, for transfer of 8-channels of audio at higher sample rates. And more importantly, on Presonus' website, the specs of the preamps for the FS actually look better than the LT, in that the FS has a lower THD (.003% vs .009%) and a higher signal-to-noise ratio (101 dB vs 98 dB).
Also, the FS actually seems to have a DAC as well as an ADC, whereas the LT is ADC only (which is all I would need it for). Basically, I just find it frustrating that they aren't just a lower and higher increment on the same model scale; instead, they seem to be unrelated, and it brings to mind the fact that the Firestudio apparently has crappier converters than the lower priced Firepod, for example, so I wonder if this is a similar situation.
I should mention that the quality of the preamps is more important than the quality of the converters, cuz I'll have 6 analog ins to work with on the FF that can handle the conversion for awhile (until I can get a real sweet preamp or two, which of course will take precedence but won't be for awhile anyway!)
Any thoughts guys?
Oh, and here's the FS and LT on Sweetwater, and the FS and LT at Presonus.com
So naturally, one would think the LT would be better, if nothing else because it costs $800 while the FS is $600. But the odd thing is, they don't really seem to be related to one another. For example, the FS has two ADAT ins and outs, for transfer of 8-channels of audio at higher sample rates. And more importantly, on Presonus' website, the specs of the preamps for the FS actually look better than the LT, in that the FS has a lower THD (.003% vs .009%) and a higher signal-to-noise ratio (101 dB vs 98 dB).
Also, the FS actually seems to have a DAC as well as an ADC, whereas the LT is ADC only (which is all I would need it for). Basically, I just find it frustrating that they aren't just a lower and higher increment on the same model scale; instead, they seem to be unrelated, and it brings to mind the fact that the Firestudio apparently has crappier converters than the lower priced Firepod, for example, so I wonder if this is a similar situation.
I should mention that the quality of the preamps is more important than the quality of the converters, cuz I'll have 6 analog ins to work with on the FF that can handle the conversion for awhile (until I can get a real sweet preamp or two, which of course will take precedence but won't be for awhile anyway!)
Any thoughts guys?
Oh, and here's the FS and LT on Sweetwater, and the FS and LT at Presonus.com