i think mine is exactly right!
our language systems involving sex were purposely constructed so that this question isn't answerable. it's the same way how when they do Middle East peace resolutions, they always leave the language around the central sticking point ambiguous, so both sides can interpret it their own way and accept the agreement and not be wrong.
example: the resolution that "Israel must withdraw from territories captured in the 1967 war". they struggled for DAYS to remove a single word from the previous wording, which was: "Israel must withdraw from the territories captured in the 1967 war" .
by removing the "the", the resolution became workable, because it allowed the pro-Israel side to vote for it without worrying that Israel would be forced to withdraw from every single scrap of captured land, but the pro-Palestinian side could satisfy themselves with a resolution that seemed to say Israel would have to.
purposeful ambiguity. i love language!