As a race, we are jealous, hateful, ignorant, and sadistic..
It makes sense if you understand our evolutionary history. All upper primates are social to some degree and violence between groups evolved as a necessary strategy in competition over resources. We're the first species that actually discovered the ability to harvest and control the production of our own resources, but that only happened within the past several thousand years. Compare that to the few million years that hominids have been around, several million more that primates have existed, millions upon millions more that mammals have existed, about 500 million or so that vertebrates have existed and over a billion that multi-cellular organisms have existed and it's pretty easy to see that any way you look at it, species are hard-wire to compete aggressively, even amongst themselves, over resources. We're just better at it.
We are unintelligent to the extreme.
As hexwind pointed out, your ability to notice unintelligence says otherwise.
We are also made pretty shitty. Our vision gives away with age...
Considering human evolutionary history and the purpose of vision, there really wasn't much selection pressure for elderly people to retain their vision. They were no longer hunting, no longer reproducing, and certainly were not spending any time reading for the majority of hominid existence. Once you're beyond the age of peak fertility, secondary competitive characterists begin to lose their value.
our teeth are non replaceable,
Our teeth to not need to be replaced because our teeth do not use them to catch struggling prey. Additionally, we're so proficient with tool use, that we're unlikely to lose teeth due to injury, either. We also have a relatively soft diet that does not result in excessive tooth decay (historically, anyway).
Exactly how many limbs have you lost? How many other people do you know who've lost limbs? Probably very few, so in the grand scheme of things, regeneration is not a characteristic that would have been selected for, because the need for it would have been virtually negligible.
If you look at other species, like a bird. It can see something a mile away with ease.
A
few bird species, such as hawks and eagles can see detail at great distances. This is because it's necessary for their survival, and consequently, those birds that with superior vision, would also be superior hunters. This would increase the probability that they would survive long enough to reproduce, and considering that birds care for their offspring, it would directly affect their ability to keep their nestlings alive. Humans haven't evolved this feature, because it has never been necessary to our survival.
If evolution was our reason, (Which I don't partake in it's theory) you'd think it would make us more durable as a species,
I suppose it's easy to reject a theory if you don't understand it.
Evolution doesn't care how "durable" you are. The only thing that matters is the ability to increase your fitness by leaving the greatest genetic legacy. If you can produce more offspring, and healthier offspring, and if they in turn produce viable offspring, then evolution considers you to be successful.
hell, we only live a century at most.
It's actually more adaptive for most species to live a
short time, because it prevents elderly members of the population from inhibiting the success of younger generations. It also increases the number of generations that can occur within a specific amount of time, and therefore also increases the rate of mutation and the genetic variability within a population, which are the driving forces of evolution.
You could say that we are magnificent and intelligent, but who do we have to compare to but ourselves?
Every other species.
There are many proofs of how stupid we are, but nothing that we are aware of orknow is smarter.
"Proofs" are things that
we invented. The fact that we even have the ability implies that we're not that stupid after all.
My theory is that we were created. by godlike people... but not, "god" from the bible.. more of an omniscient ET species who have been splicing genes,
That's not a theory. In fact, that's not even a hypothesis, it's just an idea. A theory is an explanation that has been substantiated by the scientific process, which involves, experimentation, peer review, retestability, and the possibility to be disproven. Evolution is still a theory after 150 years, because it has proven itself against even the most rigorous scientific scrutiny.
Evolution of humans, the conception of it is too ... well, it leaves too many questions unanswered. existence is complex.
On the contrary. It doesn't leave many questions unanswered, it merely provides answers that
you, personally, don't understand or haven't taken the time to learn about yet. That's not evolution's fault. It's yours.
We have *every other form of life known about* to compare ourselves to.
