Process : Creation of Human

[BlackMetalWhiteGuy]

Actually Microbes,parasites, bacteria, and viruses don't "prey" on us, they exist in us like we exist in the planet, and like how we used the earths rotation to fly to the moon. We are host, but they aren't "preying on us". Preying would be them deliberately hunting mankind out to extinction, and they have never mounted a large scale assault on mankind. There have been outbreaks of certain diseases, but all those microbes etc. use us like we use the planet. We drill for oil, dig up and explode huge areas of land, we cut down entire forests, but we aren't preying on the planet. One day we may be able to fly to other planets and then we will colonize them and begin the process we have here, domesticate animals, mine and collect resources, in habit until it is unusable. That's what microbes etc. do, they all use us to live and reproduce on, there are many microbes, parasites, viruses and shit that are in us right now and aren't hurting us at all! Some hurt us, some don't. In other words, Thoth-Amon, despite our shared interest in Robert E. Howards Literature, you're incorrect.
@ the guy above Thoth - to long; didn't read.

In that case, let me sum it up for you. Basically, what you said in your previous post was wrong, so I corrected you. After you go back and read it, you will be slightly better educated than you were before. Otherwise, you will continue making the same ignorant mistakes and smart people will continue to laugh at you for it.

 

[monoxide_child]

We really don't have the best bodies at all. In fact, our comparatively feeble bodies made us vulnerable to much predation in our evolutionary history and it was one of the primary selection pressures that caused our brains and social structures to develop as they did. No other animal has the human foot, but how many animals can you think of that would actually benefit from switching their own feet with ours? Our feet are specifically adapted to suit our locomotive strategy and would actually be deleterious if applied to most other species.

actually the same could be said for our hands
our fully prehensile fingers and partially prehensile thumbs are designed for gripping weapons, our arms are built for swinging clubs (almost exactly the same motion as a baseball batter hitting the ball with the bat during a baseball game) and animal that has long sharp claws wouldn't be able to attack something with a baseball bat because they're bodies wouldn't be built to do it, becase they wouldn't need to, because they have the long sharp claws, also an animal with long sharp claws wouldn't have the mental ability to know how to swing a baseball bat even if we gave it human arms/hands/fingers

 

[BlackMetalWhiteGuy]

actually the same could be said for our hands
our fully prehensile fingers and partially prehensile thumbs are designed for gripping weapons, our arms are built for swinging clubs (almost exactly the same motion as a baseball batter hitting the ball with the bat during a baseball game)

Our hands aren't designed for gripping weapons, they're designed for gripping branches. Similarly, our arms aren't designed for swinging weapons, they're designed for brachiation (swinging from branches). The fact that we're able to grip and swing weapons is not an adaptive feature, it's an example of exaptation, a phenomenon in which an feature that is adapted for one purpose can suddenly be applied to another with little to no modification.

and animal that has long sharp claws wouldn't be able to attack something with a baseball bat because they're bodies wouldn't be built to do it, becase they wouldn't need to, because they have the long sharp claws,

They can't grip and swing weapons because their feet are adapted for ground walking, rather than branch gripping. This is the same reason why we are one of the few primate species that cannot grip things (very well) with our feet.

also an animal with long sharp claws wouldn't have the mental ability to know how to swing a baseball bat even if we gave it human arms/hands/fingers

Whether or not it would have the mental capacity to do so is completely independent from its external anatomy. Crows don't have the anatomy to support club swinging, but they still have the mental capacity to use tools in other ways. There are also cats that can turn door knobs, octopuses that can uncork or unscrew bottle caps, dolphins that can play basket ball and sea lions apparently understand the transitive property of logic.

 

[monoxide_child]

Our hands aren't designed for gripping weapons, they're designed for gripping branches. Similarly, our arms aren't designed for swinging weapons, they're designed for brachiation (swinging from branches). The fact that we're able to grip and swing weapons is not an adaptive feature, it's an example of exaptation, a phenomenon in which an feature that is adapted for one purpose can suddenly be applied to another with little to no modification.
so, you're saying that children climb trees because human bodies are build to do it
They can't grip and swing weapons because their feet are adapted for ground walking, rather than branch gripping. This is the same reason why we are one of the few primate species that cannot grip things (very well) with our feet.
so how do you explain the people that write/paint/drive with their feet?
Whether or not it would have the mental capacity to do so is completely independent from its external anatomy. Crows don't have the anatomy to support club swinging, but they still have the mental capacity to use tools in other ways. There are also cats that can turn door knobs, octopuses that can uncork or unscrew bottle caps, dolphins that can play basket ball and sea lions apparently understand the transitive property of logic.

okay this part about the animals is all stuff i already knew, but i had just momentarily forgotten about it