Precisely. In my opening post I outlined that they're invalidating themselves, especially their considered 'prime' era by making fun rock and roll music.
Here's what you originally wrote:
Now we are supposed to believe Fenriz has been listening to his Cirith Ungol and Brocas Helm LPs from the 80's all this time. Expect a lot more of this reactionary embracing of Heavy Metal by disgruntled black metal bands in the future. Understandable because of all the racist idiots surrounding the 'Wagner as Black Metal PURE ROMANTIC ART NO my pals' scene, but also a bit stupid in its own right.
You're drawing an obvious distinction between the 'racist idiots' in the 'PURE ROMANTIC ART NO my pals' scene and DarkThrone, and explicitly suggesting that any identification with 'heavy metal' must be a 'reactionary' step on the part of DarkThrone
motivated by the NSBM scene. You're complaining about 'historical revisionism' that you can in no way prove, while
practicing 'historical revisionism'
in your own thread. Does the entire concept of irony escape you?
There is of course, a larger question you raise. How, exactly, does a band 'invalidate' their earlier work if in their later career, the quality of their material declines? All you've done is illustrate the point that Spinaza Ray Prozak and the ANUSites have been making for a decade and more: black metal blew its creative wad early on, then cannibalized itself in a way that threw aside everything that made black metal an artistically significant movement in the first place.
More like I am extremely familiar with Cirith Ungol, and only moderately with Bathory.
Thanks for confirming what I already said.
I am in fact that familiar with Cirith Ungol that I can tell you there's hardly any 'acoustic passages' in their music. There's a few songs that have clean (electric) instrumentation, but they don't usually intersect with the metal material.
Welcome to Bathory, and pretty much every other band with clean/accoustic passages. Oops.
I can argue the 'folk' melodies either way, because this is a nebulous concept to apply to a rock band (what band has not had any 'folk melodies' I'd like to know) but oh well. It's just interesting that you came to the conclusion I am not familiar with Bathory right out of the blue there.
I didn't come to the conclusion 'out of the blue' - I came to the conclusion based on your inability to recognize the many obvious convergences between classic (
One Foot in Hell) Cirith Ungol and 'viking' era Bathory. That you then confirmed my analysis merely demonstrates that your whole show of indignation is a bunch of crap.
Your point is under inspection. This would be a good time to let me know of some source that connects Bathory with Cirith Ungol because otherwise we'd just have to agree to disagree on having different sets of ears on this one.
Do your own homework, kid. If you don't know, it's not my job to dig up the interviews for you. It should be obvious merely from listening, but then again, you haven't shown yourself to be particularly bright or observant, so I don't know why I would expect you to make the obvious connection.
Label doesn't have much to do with it in this -sad- case. Otherwise, you better let what's left of Cirith Ungol know how popular they were in the 90's because they surely disbanded under as they had put it, a severly disappointing ten-year career of absolutely no positive financial return or artistic recognition.
The band's most popular and influential album was released in 1986 on METAL BLADE, then the largest and most widely distributed metal label in existence. It is worth noting that
One Foot in Hell has remained in print since its release and got significant coverage in the major American and European 'zines and rags at the time of its release (as did Omen, who also were on Metal Blade). These bands may be 'obscure' now, but only because they stood outside the general arc of metal's subsequent development. They weren't any more 'underground' at the time than bands we now think of as genre staples like Fates Warning or Helloween.
We live in 2007 and now it's 'cool' to like Cirith Ungol suddenly and download their records from the internet. It wasn't always so. I know of them because I live in greece and the guy that got me into metal had eclectic taste. Once they were 'the worst heavy metal band there is'.
You're what, 18, 19 years old? And you're lecturing the rest of us on
HISTORY?!!!
Actually this is not so much more than it is so, I propose. It's mind-numbingly strange how bands are influenced by the last generation of metal before theirs, but sometimes know little or nothing about the influences of their influences, or even if they do, they don't like them. A band influenced by In Flames usually doesn't know At the Gates or find them 'not melodic enough', a band influenced by Candlemass doesn't know Black Sabbath or find them 'too blues, man'. So on.
Maybe that's the case among younger fans, but I can't think of any bands who approvingly cite their influences and then trash the influences of those influences.
EDIT: wait, wait. I agree to what? The early Bathory imagery, what with the pentagram and goats is equally, if not more influential to Black Metal as a whole than their viking era iconography.
Not in the Norse scene, it wasn't. Only Mayhem (who were contemporaries rather than descendents of Bathory) and Gorgoroth really played the Satanic element strongly, the rest of the bands pushed the pagan/medieval elements much more strongly.
I do agree that it would fit their career, and I do agree that the rise and fall concept you suggest applies to a lot of bands, but usually bands like dismember or deicide when on the way out, start to ape their own eariler work. They become tribute bands to themselves. You don't see Dismember making a heavy metal record
Ah, Dismember and Unleashed have both made very heavy metal inflected records in recent years, and Deicide's recent releases are much more rooted in speed metal than anything from their classic era.
And what, precisely, do you think Control Denied was?