I actually think its pretty messed up that they're suing that woman for that much money. I mean....why not just charge her for a little more than what the albums are worth? Because damn, thats pretty much overkill to sue one person that much when the albums are like...what, 10-12$ US. Its not like she hurt them in anyway aside from them not getting like, 50 bucks or something. So because they did not get their money for what the songs were worth...they are now suing her for hundreds of thousands of dollars? Overkill for sure.
Just My two cents.
This whole article is really odd to me, maybe i didn't read the article correctly?