So I watched the Rob Zombie movies in the last 2 days

getting in before all the Rob Zombie haters.


love those movies.

I find them both great for their own merits. I love the comicbook horror stylings of the first, and then the twist to more straightforward slasher in the 2nd.


(yeah, the 2nd one is better)
 
My problem with the 1st one is that it just came across as a loosely packaged "best of" all his favorite horror scenes from earlier (better done) movies.

The 2nd one had a much better story and was more creative IMO.
 
markgugs said:
My problem with the 1st one is that it just came across as a loosely packaged "best of" all his favorite horror scenes from earlier (better done) movies.

The 2nd one had a much better story and was more creative IMO.

I totally agree with you ... but we are alone on this ... everyone has the total opposite opinion
 
i saw both of these at the theater. meh, decent. not "top 10 horror movie" material though
 
dorian gray said:
i saw both of these at the theater. meh, decent. not "top 10 horror movie" material though

No! Not even close, not even Devil's Rejects which I *did* enjoy.

I highly doubt anything made from this point on will ever even come close to top 10 horror movie material.
 
WHY DOES ANYONE LIKE THIS MOVIE!?!? seriously one of the worst i've ever seen. ONE STAR.

House of 1000 Corpses was perfectly okay for good stupid fun.
 
look, House was stupid. it was campy. it was lame. but it didn't try to be anything but a lame B-movie with lots of blood and guts. it knew its place.

Devil's Rejects tried to be a real movie. it was like Zombie said "okay enough with the silly stuff, let's get serious." and it totally sucked out the fun for me.
 
Devil's was still completely campy, at least this time 'round he connected the over-the-top gore with some actual *gasp* tension! And a story! I also like that Devil's was indeed an homage to classic horror flicks without blatantly aping them.

House was simply an exercise in "let's see just how many people I can make vomit."