soloC & new awesome impulse

tweak the mids a little. that'll add body to guitars. basically not bad, but sounds a little dry, like old sepultura albums.
 
but of course there's no right or wrong. if that's what you want, nevermind the words i say:)
 
Very cool tone! I like it because it's kinda unusual... all I hear around here are super fat and tight tones all the time, it's nice to hear something that's isn't so extremely saturated and tight. The tone is a bit dark, which is a nice thing, and more tweaking could make it even better yea.

Still, I think it's a pretty pleasant tone to the ears, atleast for me. I'm so used with super tight modern distortion these days :p
 
thank you for your comments,this is extremely EQed, but obviously in the wrong way... the goal was to make it natural hi gain tight guitar ,but i i screw it up.After many hours of tweaking it SOUNDED natural to me,,,but now its kind of sci-fi :),,,it is not bad but it is not what I wanted to do :). I hope that that I don't get buried by forum :) for saying this but I have about 7 EQ on this track.I tried to fix it cuz my tracks dont sound even close to something Good people on this forum post and say HP and LP only no post processing.Anyway I would appreciate very much if u can give me some tips what to do with EQ on impulses.For example this is what im talking about, this is the first version,it is soloC with 7170 and this is what is sounds like http://www.box.net/shared/zhxcq5j8sm ,TERRIBLE ,when I blend this 2 sims togather phase comes am i doing something wrong? in this clip it is not very very obvious.help me get that super tight modern distortion !! :) Thank you very much!
p.s. it is smoke on the water :) hahahaha
 
To be honest man the key is to not over-process your raw files.
When I do just literally the bare essentials to a guitar tone, high pass, low pass, and an obligatory wide 2-3db cut at 900hz if revalver is involved, a surgical cut at 100hz to kill rumble, and maybe one or two other minor cuts or boosts, I always get a much better sounding tone. More natural, bigger, wider, heavier, which is everything I'm usually going for in the first place.

I *ALWAYS* overprocess my guitar raws, and then as I carry on refining the mix, or do another iteration of the mix, I always cut down on the processing of the guitars especially. Just try and keep them as raw as possible and you'll probably get what you want as long as you dialled in a good tone to begin with.

Also try setting your high pass and low pass, THEN dial in your tone. I find that I end up dialling in huge amounts of bass for a thick tone, then I high pass, low pass, 10khz shelf boost, 100hz surgical cut and then turn off my eq and realise my tone is boomy and fizzy as fuck. I seem to subconsciouslly compensate for the basic eq'ing that I do, because I find that when I high pass and low pass I most of the boom and fizz that I didn't like in the raw tone, and I'm just left with the good stuff, so don't be afraid to experiment with what look like ridiculous tones. Jason Suecof puts his bass at 10 on 6505's I believe.
 
XRated thank you for tips, I will post soon another sample so you can tell me am I going to the right direction.The main problem to me is ,sound of upper mids, its always too harsh to my ears so I EQ that area mostly.I set gain about 4-5 so not much, if tube screamer in front and it is bringing more gain, then I lower it so I dont get more nasty freq. I usualy LP at 10k (but it depends on impulse) and HP at 80-90,but this test is not HP cuz I didnt record bass and I wanted some meat :).But when I LP at 10k the guitars kinda lose brightness and if I high shelf on 9-8k or 10k it introduces some fizz.I will post soon test with minimum processing.Thank you very much for tips and help