Yeah, SOAD aren't pop and I don't think I've ever heard them played on a pop station. So that's nae really a valid comment.
I have heard them on a pop radio station. And what is POP? Popular music. SOAD were massively popular. That's how they earned money playing music.
Pop isn't an insult.
Yes, but "pop" no longer denotes any music that's popular, just like "indie" no longer denotes any music that's independent.
I think not. I mean, its good on some songs, like Question! and Chop Suey and a few others, but on songs like BYOB and Suite Pee, I just want to smash my radio against a brick wall.
Indie music isn't independent though. It's become it's own style.
Same with pop. It isn't a set genre. There's loads of different styles on the radios.. Like there's dubstep and then all that auto tuned bollocks, then other rather different stuff. It's all pop. So when SOAD were constantly on BBC and the top 40, it was pop... I suppose it still is pop.
It just wasn't, and isn't. It was metal. Popular metal may be popular, but it isn't pop... If someone asked you what pop music sounds like, and you played them SOAD, then that would be massively unrepresentative of what pop music is. In fact I entirely disagree... I'd say that pop music is a set genre recognisable for its musical characteristics. X-Factor bollocks and all that, or Vengaboys in the 90s... Are you really telling me that Iron Maiden were pop music when Bring Your Daughter to the Slaughter got to #1? Just because it was popular for a bit?!
There are loads of popular bands that don't play pop music. Radiohead, The Prodigy, SOAD, Metallica... All have received extensive radio play at points of their respective careers without playing pop music... or what about Miles Davis? He's pretty popular, I'm sure Kind of Blue has sold a hell of a lot of copies! But to lump him in with Gareth Gates or Five-Star or Blue is kind of harsh, no?