I agree with the posts here. It's hard to defend them because it's not free-market decisions that got them where they are. I teach economics and I can usually rationalize any kind business decision, but ticketmaster provides a challenge in that regard. To me, the worst part is they are so secretive about what the stuff goes for. I've had students try to do some research on ticketmaster before and getting them to explain WHERE the "convenience charge" money goes is like pulling teeth. We did get one assisstant manager one time to tell us that he "thought" the convenience charge money and the processing fees actually get funneled into the same account, but he couldn't be sure.
Does anyone know or has anyone met anyone who actually works at ticketmaster? Maybe they could offer an explanation.
The only thing I can think of is that they provide some sort of extra kickback to the venues for using them. Otherwise, I can't see how they could POSSIBLY have the sort of near-monopoly they have; with the way EVERYONE complains about TicketRapist, if the venues didn't see some sort of advantage to using them, then the smaller ticket agents would be used more often.
I think the more interesting experiment would be to go to the venues and find out why they use TicketRapist as opposed to the other companies, despite the fact that their customers hate it.