- Mar 22, 2007
- 107
- 0
- 16
- 32


apart from each other, both are without parallel in regards to originality and ambition. truly amazing pieces of literature

bro i don't take lightly to statements like that. when you come into my threads you better show me some respect. actual respect. next time i won't be so lenient. consider yourself warned.I think you did not read too many books...
thats right. know you place and back down.Wait nevermind
oh god right in the literacy ow
yeah, but what are these people reading beyond Harry Potter? the "revolution" just kinda started and stopped.Whomever is behind this account, awesome on slyly calling out Dan Brown for the utter hack that he is. It's almost an insult to decent YA fiction (Rowling) to classify it with that tripe. Normally I'm in favor of anything that gets the American populace to get off their collective fat ass long enough to hit the library or a bookstore and place a thin sheaf of written word between themselves and the TV, but Code is just too fucking awful. And it has pretensions.
bro i don't take lightly to statements like that. when you come into my threads you better show me some respect. actual respect. next time i won't be so lenient. consider yourself warned.
thats right. know you place and back down.
DAN DORWN I ONLY GOT THROUGH THE PREFACE....
POTTER LOOKED AT THE COVER AND LAUGHED WHAT WITCHCRAFT, blah blah, good for quiz nights but