(as reported on Uraniummusic.com)
New legislation: Online MP3 swappers to face felony charges, 5 year prison sentence
Posted: July 17, 2003, 7:40 am
REUTERS - Internet users who allow others to copy songs from their hard drives could face prison time under legislation introduced by two Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday.
The bill is the strongest attempt yet to deter the widespread online song copying that recording companies say has led to a decline in CD sales.
Sponsored by Michigan Rep. John Conyers and California Rep. Howard Berman, the bill would make it easier to slap criminal charges on Internet users who copy music, movies and other copyrighted files over "peer-to-peer" networks.
The recording industry has aggressively pursued Napster, Kazaa and other peer-to-peer networks in court and recently announced it planned to sue individual users as well.
In a series of hearings on Capitol Hill last spring, lawmakers condemned online song swapping and expressed concern the networks could spread computer viruses, create government security risks and allow children access to pornography.
Few online copyright violators have faced criminal charges so far. A New Jersey man pleaded guilty to distributing a digital copy of the movie "The Hulk" in federal court three weeks ago, but the Justice Department has not taken action against Internet users who offer millions of copies of songs each day.
The Conyers-Berman bill would operate under the assumption that each copyrighted work made available through a computer network was copied by others at least 10 times for a total retail value of $2,500. That would bump the activity from a misdemeanor to a felony, carrying a sentence of up to five years in jail.
It would also outlaw the practice of videotaping a movie in the theater, a favorite illicit method of copying movies.
"While existing laws have been useful in stemming this problem, they simply do not go far enough," said Conyers, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.
The Recording Industry Association of America praised the bill and said it would help them fight illegal online copying.
One copyright expert said the bill paints online song-swapping with too broad a brush as much of that activity does not rise to a criminal level.
"We don't think it should be the role of the FBI to treat all copyright infringement as criminal," said Mike Godwin, staff counsel at Public Sector, a nonprofit group that frequently disagrees with the RIAA.
A Conyers staffer said the bill had won the backing of many Democrats but Republicans had yet to endorse it.
The staffer said backers hoped to discuss the bill at a hearing on Thursday and combine it next week with another sponsored by Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith, who chairs an intellectual-property subcommittee.
"Once we have the opportunity to analyze the bill language we will be able to determine how it affects our fight against piracy," a Smith spokesman said in an e-mail message.
Uranium Comment: I posted this to show how absurd this is getting. I firmly believe that artists should be compensated in full, but slapping felony charges on activities engaged in daily by millions of teenagers and adults isn't going to solve anything. The point is, a precedence has been established, and there is no going back. However hard you try to clamp down on online MP3 swapping, IT WILL ALWAYS HAPPEN. Or, we can waste tax dollars and prison space on avid music fans who had one too many Metallica albums on their computers.
New legislation: Online MP3 swappers to face felony charges, 5 year prison sentence
Posted: July 17, 2003, 7:40 am
REUTERS - Internet users who allow others to copy songs from their hard drives could face prison time under legislation introduced by two Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday.
The bill is the strongest attempt yet to deter the widespread online song copying that recording companies say has led to a decline in CD sales.
Sponsored by Michigan Rep. John Conyers and California Rep. Howard Berman, the bill would make it easier to slap criminal charges on Internet users who copy music, movies and other copyrighted files over "peer-to-peer" networks.
The recording industry has aggressively pursued Napster, Kazaa and other peer-to-peer networks in court and recently announced it planned to sue individual users as well.
In a series of hearings on Capitol Hill last spring, lawmakers condemned online song swapping and expressed concern the networks could spread computer viruses, create government security risks and allow children access to pornography.
Few online copyright violators have faced criminal charges so far. A New Jersey man pleaded guilty to distributing a digital copy of the movie "The Hulk" in federal court three weeks ago, but the Justice Department has not taken action against Internet users who offer millions of copies of songs each day.
The Conyers-Berman bill would operate under the assumption that each copyrighted work made available through a computer network was copied by others at least 10 times for a total retail value of $2,500. That would bump the activity from a misdemeanor to a felony, carrying a sentence of up to five years in jail.
It would also outlaw the practice of videotaping a movie in the theater, a favorite illicit method of copying movies.
"While existing laws have been useful in stemming this problem, they simply do not go far enough," said Conyers, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.
The Recording Industry Association of America praised the bill and said it would help them fight illegal online copying.
One copyright expert said the bill paints online song-swapping with too broad a brush as much of that activity does not rise to a criminal level.
"We don't think it should be the role of the FBI to treat all copyright infringement as criminal," said Mike Godwin, staff counsel at Public Sector, a nonprofit group that frequently disagrees with the RIAA.
A Conyers staffer said the bill had won the backing of many Democrats but Republicans had yet to endorse it.
The staffer said backers hoped to discuss the bill at a hearing on Thursday and combine it next week with another sponsored by Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith, who chairs an intellectual-property subcommittee.
"Once we have the opportunity to analyze the bill language we will be able to determine how it affects our fight against piracy," a Smith spokesman said in an e-mail message.
Uranium Comment: I posted this to show how absurd this is getting. I firmly believe that artists should be compensated in full, but slapping felony charges on activities engaged in daily by millions of teenagers and adults isn't going to solve anything. The point is, a precedence has been established, and there is no going back. However hard you try to clamp down on online MP3 swapping, IT WILL ALWAYS HAPPEN. Or, we can waste tax dollars and prison space on avid music fans who had one too many Metallica albums on their computers.
