why was the "Why was the orchid 2 thread deleted" thread locked?

Sean Casey said:
i'm only asking a question.



I would guess that some here have yet to mature to the point of posting replies that pertain to the topic at hand. It's sad that such a talented band would attract a few lame minded individuals. This forum we be far better if we repected one another's opinions. 2cents. :)
 
Sean Casey said:
i'm only asking a question.

So was I..... and you haven't answered it.

Here's a few more.

Did you actually read the "Why was the orchid 2 thread deleted?" thread?
or
your "Lo and behold" thread?
or
your "" LETS LOCK EVERY THREAD WHERE PEOPLE SAY THEY DON'T LIKE OPETH" thread and perhaps sense some sort of pattern developing?

Are you really that clueless that you cannot comprehend my explanation for both deleting the origonal "Orchid 2" thread and why I locked the 2nd one?

Did you read where I asked you to address further concerns and questions to me via PM instead of clogging the forum with this stupid shit?

What exactly are you trying to learn or accomplish by creating this thread, anyway?

Have you read the guidelines?

Do you think you any of your posts/threads have fallen into the catagories of Spam?

How long do you think I'm really going to subject the rest of the forum to this SPAM?


Oh, my aching head.:erk:
 
i aint play this said:
^What does ''lo and behold'' mean?

It's an "Interjection" used to express wonder or suprise.... often in a sarcastic manner such as in the title of his thread titled, "Lo and hehold" and his 4 word post, "My thread got deleted"... that's right... he created an entire thead consisting of that title and that first post.


Sean... you seriously have one post left to convince me not to ban you.
 
Sean Casey said:
and by the way, I didn't answer your question because it was rhetorical.

Usually the person who asks the question is the best qualified to label it as a rhetorical question..... and it wasn't. Feel free to ponder it for a few minutes, but I do expect an answer.
 
Mr Samsara said:
Usually the person who asks the question is the best qualified to label it as a rhetorical question..... and it wasn't. Feel free to ponder it for a few minutes, but I do expect an answer.

no let me tell you what happened, I asked you to answer my question and you needed something to counter it, so you tried to change what you intended and made yourself look very silly.
 
Sean Casey said:
no let me tell you what happened, I asked you to answer my question and you needed something to counter it, so you tried to change what you intended and made yourself look very silly.

For the 3rd time.... the thread was locked because the question you asked in that thread was answered... in detail. In it I also specifically asked you to ask me via PM any additional questions you may have..

You're spamming the forum.... repeatedly.

You're creating a smug, evasive and passively antogonistic online persona.

You refuse repeated requests to use PM and handle this privately in favor of making a public spectacle of yourself.

I've asked you several times to redeem yourself with a single post which may just shed some light on what the hell you're thinking in case I'm just getting you all wrong and you say I'm making myself look silly... (and actually you're correct. I do look silly at this point.)

I mean seriously, Sean... Do you think when you are banned it's going to be for a week? That you will get another chance? What purpose would that serve? This IS your chance. This ugly public display will result in a permanent ban. We will go the extra mile to assure re-registering under another username is squelched.... There are not going to be other chances. Either step up and admit your error, commit to changing your ways and appologize to the rest of the forum for wasting their time.... or you're out. I'm sure I've made myself perfectly clear.