Your enemy is.....

TheAssMaster

Member
Nov 2, 2005
331
0
16
ENGLAND!!!!
Apparently, the greatest threat to the U.S. is not Iraq or Iran but Great Britain. And, I'm sad to say I agree, the cunts in charge of things have just stuck their heads in the sand while wave after wave of dirty shitskins have flooded into the UK from all manner of fly-bitten shithole countries. Of course when they get here, the hard-of-thinking fall over themselves to give this scum British passports and MY cash.
Suitably armed with their Lion and Unicorn crested passport, they then set off to blow up planes and cause mayhem. If I hear once more that "Briton Mahmood PatelMistrySinghKhanMohammed etc has been arrested/shot/blown up/is being sought" I'm going to puke.
Just remember this,they are not British and never will be British. I don't give a flying fuck how long they have been here, or their families, they are NOT British. They should all fuck off back to Kashmir, take their fucking Balti houses with them, and then they can fuck/kill bum each others' goat all day long for all I care. I'm sick of these cunts bringing my wonderful country into disrepute, but worse, I'm appalled that no-one has given a shit about this "revelation". Once upon a time there would have been outcry, today we just say nothing and try to ignore it, I think we're fucked. Perhaps it's time for me to go and become a wog in someone else's country........


Can I come to the U.S please? I like assault rifles.


And beef jerky



And apple pie.


Fucking hell, I AM turning into Jurched, I need a vacation.
 
America is always welcoming in new people. You may enter one of three ways.
-You may don a turbin and enter through Canada at the Niagra Falls border.
-You may fly to Mexico, wait until dark and hop in the back of any old pickup truck. Bring spending money to pay off the policia and to buy some nut-shampoo to get rid of crabs.
-Or, you can fly to Cuba and boat in on the flotation device of your choice. You can swim, right?
I guess you have the EU to thank for the influx of curry-eaters eh? If you decide to come to America, let me know. I will put you up for a while and even let you borrow an assault rifle until you get your own. :kickass:
 
Good post Assmaster. There are some other threats to the US to consider too. China is responsible for most spying on the US (stealing plans for technology and inventions). And out of all allies of the US, Israel is responsible for the most aggressive espionage.

There is only one political party in Britain that would throw out the Muslims. And the BNP could realistically be elected sometime. But would America (as well as other nations) then declare war on Britain?
The neocons would be outraged if Britian had a nationalist government.
 
Norsemaiden said:
Good post Assmaster. There are some other threats to the US to consider too. China is responsible for most spying on the US (stealing plans for technology and inventions). And out of all allies of the US, Israel is responsible for the most aggressive espionage.

There is only one political party in Britain that would throw out the Muslims. And the BNP could realistically be elected sometime. But would America (as well as other nations) then declare war on Britain?
The neocons would be outraged if Britian had a nationalist government.

China is the true, new threat...the FBI and CIA are recruiting Chinese speaking folk and learning the language...in 10 yeras the explosion will be out of control!!! Beware the Shaolin Monks and the Drunken Monkey clan.:erk:
 
Norsemaiden said:
Good post Assmaster. There are some other threats to the US to consider too. China is responsible for most spying on the US (stealing plans for technology and inventions). And out of all allies of the US, Israel is responsible for the most aggressive espionage.

There is only one political party in Britain that would throw out the Muslims. And the BNP could realistically be elected sometime. But would America (as well as other nations) then declare war on Britain?
The neocons would be outraged if Britian had a nationalist government.


I am not sure what the US repsonse would be--declare war?I dont think so, sanctions--prob not. I cant see the US declaring war on the UK for something like that--afterall the UK--England, Ireland, and Scotland are not only our motherland but our bloodbrothers as well(I know we have been at war before but thats different). I would like think it might start a trend in the US and other English based lands
 
Norsemaiden said:
Good post Assmaster. There are some other threats to the US to consider too. China is responsible for most spying on the US (stealing plans for technology and inventions). And out of all allies of the US, Israel is responsible for the most aggressive espionage.

There is only one political party in Britain that would throw out the Muslims. And the BNP could realistically be elected sometime. But would America (as well as other nations) then declare war on Britain?
The neocons would be outraged if Britian had a nationalist government.
Don't you think there are just enough Zionists in the US where we wouldn't declare war on Britain for booting the Muslims out?
 
Norsemaiden said:
Good post Assmaster. There are some other threats to the US to consider too. China is responsible for most spying on the US (stealing plans for technology and inventions). And out of all allies of the US, Israel is responsible for the most aggressive espionage.

There is only one political party in Britain that would throw out the Muslims. And the BNP could realistically be elected sometime. But would America (as well as other nations) then declare war on Britain?
The neocons would be outraged if Britian had a nationalist government.

Griffen and Co. (BNP) do have potential...though their rather overblown stance against other White Nationalist groups who differ on the Zionist/Israel issue is problematic. This same divide exist between various racialist groups in the US. Divided we fall, and all that...
 
OldScratch said:
Griffen and Co. (BNP) do have potential...though their rather overblown stance against other White Nationalist groups who differ on the Zionist/Israel issue is problematic. This same divide exist between various racialist groups in the US. Divided we fall, and all that...


Very true, they lack a unified front
 
I'm not sure, but I think that Griffin is all for unity, but either on his terms with the BNP, or else secretly that the other nationalist groups should be unified but say should the things that he has decided it is imprudent (from a popularist aspect) for the BNP to say. Does he really go out of his way to criticise other nationalists/racial loyalists, or can it be explained in this way? I know that there has long been criticism of Combat 18, the skinhead organisation. They, and who knows what other such groups, are a State set-up. Even the BNP or Griffin may have an element of State interference, but you just have to hope for the best.

The BNP seems to be taking a road of apparant moderation, distancing itself from the more radical nationalists. That is what is bringing in the results. You don't get so far wearing your heart on your sleeve in politics - unless you already have a situation where the people are truly desperate for a change, like happened when Hitler got elected.
 
Norsemaiden said:
I'm not sure, but I think that Griffin is all for unity, but either on his terms with the BNP, or else secretly that the other nationalist groups should be unified but say should the things that he has decided it is imprudent (from a popularist aspect) for the BNP to say. Does he really go out of his way to criticise other nationalists/racial loyalists, or can it be explained in this way? I know that there has long been criticism of Combat 18, the skinhead organisation. They, and who knows what other such groups, are a State set-up. Even the BNP or Griffin may have an element of State interference, but you just have to hope for the best.

The BNP seems to be taking a road of apparant moderation, distancing itself from the more radical nationalists. That is what is bringing in the results. You don't get so far wearing your heart on your sleeve in politics - unless you already have a situation where the people are truly desperate for a change, like happened when Hitler got elected.


I agree, to have effective and radical change in a nations political structure the key is moderation and stealth, my reasoning is that Americans, and Brits I suspect as well, too much change scares people, especially when "human rights" are involved or perceived to be in the mix, and as you said, only in times of drastic crisis does our nation openly embrace radical change or a radical idea. Such as with the US an event like 9/11 brought racial profiling and that was ok with the general public but a great example of the opposite of this, here in Nevada anyway, is a political group called the WPP--white peoples party, now their platform deals mostly with illegal immigration from our southern border, and some other excellent topics like national language, ending affirmative action, etc BUT they will never be taken seriously because of their name--its too radical for some and scary for others. Moderation is the key
 
Griffen and the BNP, like the research think-tank American Renaissance here in the US have recenty made loud overtures to distance themselves from virtually ANY Nationalist or Racialist organization who even questions Israel's obscene influence over both US and UK foreign policy, let alone is openly hostile toward Jews as a group. Let's face it, obviously no one openly advocating or embracing National Socialism is an asset to any modern movement, politically speaking(whatever your feelings on it may be). However, the idea that a certain group is essentially "off-limits" to justified criticism, because that's just too politically or socially "sensitive" or some such, is ludicrous coming out of groups who are essentially written off as "Nazis" or what have you anyway.
Although the continued Muslim shenanigans do help the BNP, etc. to a degree, I honestly cannot see such a party/movement succeeding in this day and age, no matter how much they condemn/eschew anti-semitism, etc.
 
Alas, it's the kiss of death to any party, no matter who they are, to have the boney finger of accusation pointed at them by the Jewish Witchfinders. Once that has been done, NOTHING will be able to convince the population at large that the party is anything more than an Einsatzgruppen in waiting, thanks to the national Shitsheets dragging it up at every opportunity.

Uncle Nick should be courting the Yids, get a couple in there to work the finances, corrupt some officals Lord Levy-style, get the loot flowing in, the life-blood of any party. Despite the wailings of the bone-head element, this is the only way to shake off accusations of Nazi style sympathies. How can we be anti-Semitic, look here at our Jewish friends working for the greater good! This wouldn't be too much trouble when you look at the bigger picture, the BNP HAS to get off the bottom rung, and deal with the major overwhelming threat to our nation, and indeed the world, that of mass migration and denigration of indigenous societies. (Or, kicking the wogs and Pakis out, to you and me)

Once that is sorted, we can deal with the other issues, the deeper cancer, but that is going to require serious surgery.
 
There already are some Jews involved, such as standing as candidates, in the BNP. This is a tricky situation. It could be beneficial in the ways that you say AssMaster. They just might be genuine supporters, rather than there to ruin things. After all,there were Jews and, more often, half or quarter Jews in the German army of the 3rd Reich, who were termed "honourary Aryans" and sometimes won the Iron Cross.
Hitler had a half Jewish personal physician, Theodor Morell.

Perhaps they could satisfy themselves that the genocide of Jews is not the nationalist aim, but resisting their genocide of us would be!

Oswald Mosley, who led the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s, allowed Jews into his party - as did Mussolini. (There's a distinction between fascism and National Socialism, and the BNP tends towards the fascist model).

If the Jews should happen to see a benefit in getting another country to kick out its Muslims - namely, that it could set a precedent for Israel merely to be seen to be following by kicking out Arabs from Israel - they may agree to help the BNP.

Really the Jews need to cease their old idea of world domination and viewing whites (and unmixed races) as an enemy. We can reach a compromise if only they can agree.

I'm always saying we can defend Israel and agree with its considerable expansion, provided we are allowed our own racial existence and destiny at the same time. What sense is there in them killing their guard dogs (a role we play) anyway? Must they act like the parasite that sucks all the blood from the host, makig both end up dead? That is crazy religious zeal. Surely there are some among them who see this?

Let's forgive eachother and work out a solution here. May be Griffin thinks like this too. If so, is it not worth a try? Mind you, Hitler already tried something similar if this is anything to go by:

Hitler and the SS had strong support for Zionism
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html
 
Norsemaiden said:
There already are some Jews involved, such as standing as candidates, in the BNP. This is a tricky situation. It could be beneficial in the ways that you say AssMaster. They just might be genuine supporters, rather than there to ruin things. After all,there were Jews and, more often, half or quarter Jews in the German army of the 3rd Reich, who were termed "honourary Aryans" and sometimes won the Iron Cross.
Hitler had a half Jewish personal physician, Theodor Morell.

Perhaps they could satisfy themselves that the genocide of Jews is not the nationalist aim, but resisting their genocide of us would be!

Oswald Mosley, who led the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s, allowed Jews into his party - as did Mussolini. (There's a distinction between fascism and National Socialism, and the BNP tends towards the fascist model).

If the Jews should happen to see a benefit in getting another country to kick out its Muslims - namely, that it could set a precedent for Israel merely to be seen to be following by kicking out Arabs from Israel - they may agree to help the BNP.

Really the Jews need to cease their old idea of world domination and viewing whites (and unmixed races) as an enemy. We can reach a compromise if only they can agree.

I'm always saying we can defend Israel and agree with its considerable expansion, provided we are allowed our own racial existence and destiny at the same time. What sense is there in them killing their guard dogs (a role we play) anyway? Must they act like the parasite that sucks all the blood from the host, makig both end up dead? That is crazy religious zeal. Surely there are some among them who see this?

Let's forgive eachother and work out a solution here. May be Griffin thinks like this too. If so, is it not worth a try? Mind you, Hitler already tried something similar if this is anything to go by:

Hitler and the SS had strong support for Zionism
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html

Let's get onto the important topics...is that really your picture, Norsemaiden?
 
Do you like apple pie with vanilla ice cream? And you would have to switch from fried toast/eggs to fried snickers bars and twinkies.



Oh yeah, and REALLY SHITTY BEER!
 
Norsemaiden said:
There already are some Jews involved, such as standing as candidates, in the BNP. This is a tricky situation. It could be beneficial in the ways that you say AssMaster. They just might be genuine supporters, rather than there to ruin things. After all,there were Jews and, more often, half or quarter Jews in the German army of the 3rd Reich, who were termed "honourary Aryans" and sometimes won the Iron Cross.
Hitler had a half Jewish personal physician, Theodor Morell.

Perhaps they could satisfy themselves that the genocide of Jews is not the nationalist aim, but resisting their genocide of us would be!

Oswald Mosley, who led the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s, allowed Jews into his party - as did Mussolini. (There's a distinction between fascism and National Socialism, and the BNP tends towards the fascist model).

If the Jews should happen to see a benefit in getting another country to kick out its Muslims - namely, that it could set a precedent for Israel merely to be seen to be following by kicking out Arabs from Israel - they may agree to help the BNP.

Really the Jews need to cease their old idea of world domination and viewing whites (and unmixed races) as an enemy. We can reach a compromise if only they can agree.

I'm always saying we can defend Israel and agree with its considerable expansion, provided we are allowed our own racial existence and destiny at the same time. What sense is there in them killing their guard dogs (a role we play) anyway? Must they act like the parasite that sucks all the blood from the host, makig both end up dead? That is crazy religious zeal. Surely there are some among them who see this?

Let's forgive eachother and work out a solution here. May be Griffin thinks like this too. If so, is it not worth a try? Mind you, Hitler already tried something similar if this is anything to go by:

Hitler and the SS had strong support for Zionism
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html


Just a side note - according to whom was Morell half-Jewish? I know he was generally reviled as a corpulent, malodorous swine, depite Hitler's fierce defense of his Doctor "feelgood." I'm curious, as I've never heard that before, and I believe he was a Party member before becoming personally attached to Hitler, which would call his even partial "Jewishness" into serious question.
It seems virtually every prominent figure (from Hitler down) that was part of or affiliated with the Party has been posthumously fingered as a closet Jew or Homosexual, as a rather naked attempt to further demonize them. As if that were necessary:Smug:
 
OldScratch said:
Just a side note - according to whom was Morell half-Jewish? I know he was generally reviled as a corpulent, malodorous swine, depite Hitler's fierce defense of his Doctor "feelgood." I'm curious, as I've never heard that before, and I believe he was a Party member before becoming personally attached to Hitler, which would call his even partial "Jewishness" into serious question.
It seems virtually every prominent figure (from Hitler down) that was part of or affiliated with the Party has been posthumously fingered as a closet Jew or Homosexual, as a rather naked attempt to further demonize them. As if that were necessary:Smug:

There are various references if you google "Theodor Morell jewish" but I am not sure how reliable the information is, as you say.
There are also reasonably credible allegataions that Morell was poisoning Hitler. On this David Irving site http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/Wagner/Hamann1.html Winifred Wagner, daughter in law of composer Richard Wagner, makes this accusation.

Winifred was convinced that Hitler bore little responsibility for the Holocaust because she felt that he was deliberately driven insane by "poisonous injections" administered by his doctor, Theodor Morell.
 
DeathsHead said:
Huge distinction, one cannot compare NS Germany to Fascist Italy or even Spain(and their German worship)

Yes, even though Hitler said in his Table Talk that if it were not for the Italian Blackshirts, there would not be the Brownshirts. Italian fascism did pave the way to some extent.

I found an interesting article about the distinction between fascism and national socialism

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_v39/ai_4629820
Anti-'fascism.' - why national socialism is not fascism
 
Interesting...the longer I live the more I am convinced that what Henry Ford said is correct, namely that most "history" is bunk.
*David Irving is excellent! I am currently reading "Nuremberg..."