derek
Grey Eminence
I only hold my own views. Being bi-polar (sorry) is a narrow way to view an engagement with politics. In fact, a shit load of problems stem from it.
Our money's not green^ It's made with good reasons, and I see your point about this Stormo, but it was a well known fact for years that there were 'serious human rights' issue in Lybia... I can't hep but wonder about the REAL reasons that all of this is taking place now, and I have to lean towards the reason that has the color green and rhymes with 'honey'....
Nowhere, that's true. But again, they weren't air-bombing their own people, which, for some reasons, makes the public so outraged that they'll sanction a war. Hey, I'm not saying they're right, I'm just saying that's the way it is.now I'm going to ask you a question Europeans absolutely love to ask Americans, only the role is reversed: what about all the other regimes that are brutalizing and killing its own citizens? Would NATO have gone and helped the Egyptians? What about Syria, now that they're starting to flare up? What about Tunisia? If NATO is so concerned for the welfare of the people, where were they then?
In the eyes of the public, the NATO operation in Libya prevents human suffering, and up til now, that's actually right. Civilian casualties have been extremely low (at least if you don't count the civlians Khadafi has killed), and not a single member of NATO forces has returned in a body bag. Entirely different story than, say Gulf War II.where are the protests? Where is the outrage against human suffering?
Our money's not green
And of course, I never disputed that, it's all about money. And PR. But I'm just saying, comparing this to the second Gulf War is just no good.
Nowhere, that's true. But again, they weren't air-bombing their own people, which, for some reasons, makes the public so outraged that they'll sanction a war. Hey, I'm not saying they're right, I'm just saying that's the way it is.
In the eyes of the public, the NATO operation in Libya prevents human suffering, and up til now, that's actually right. Civilian casualties have been extremely low (at least if you don't count the civlians Khadafi has killed), and not a single member of NATO forces has returned in a body bag. Entirely different story than, say Gulf War II.
I think most people don't mind that much that it's about monetary gain, since the lives of the people that Khadafi is prevented to bomb are worth it.
Does anyone know how much oil they have in libya?
Djöfull;9737041 said:2% of the world reserves. 10% of it goes to Europe.
P.S. The mrsa scare seems a hoax, since most people can host that bacteria on their skin. Immuno- compromised people are at risk though, like in hospitals.
Uhm, excuse me, but almost all of my family in town have it (8 people, ranging from older adults, myself (immunocompromised) to my healthy 3, 4, 12, 18, and 20 year old cousins. It's done serious damage, especially when the little girls were in diapers. My boyfriend's dad almost lost his hand over it years ago and his aunt had it inside her breast tissue recently. My best friend and I are still battling it and it almost killed me from TSS last year. Two of my other good friends just caught it and it completely filled half of one of their faces with pus, now it's coming back. Almost all of these people I mentioned are healthy and are rarely sick. It attacks everyone from children to elderly to athletes in the prime of their lives.
Djöfull;9737604 said:Interesting and newsworthy. Any newslinks of this localized epidemic?
What you mean to say is: I really feel for you and your friends, Lesa, and I hope you all get through it soon and live long, healthy lives free of the mother fucker that is .
However, anecdotal evidence is the absolute worst method of assessing medical and scientific problems and often leads to more harm being done, even unintentionally. Therefore, do you happen to have any news links regarding this localised epidemic, because I'd be interested in understanding it better.
Djöfull;9738228 said:I am not a fan of Ghaddafi .